[Bug 247253] New: Conflicting Provides
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Summary: Conflicting Provides
Product: Fedora
Version: f7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL
AssignedTo: chris(a)chrisgrau.com
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
perl-Time-Piece provides perl(Time::Piece) EQ 0 1.09
perl-Time-Piece-MySQL provides perl(Time::Piece)
required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch
required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch
required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch
required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch
Indeed. perl-Time-Piece-MySQL does not include a Time::Piece
module and therefore must not provide perl(Time::Piece).
Luck has it that a second dependency on Time::Seconds
pulls in perl-Time-Piece. Else it would break.
[...]
Further reference, similar cases:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2007-July/msg00011...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 450412] New: please build in EL-5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450412
Summary: please build in EL-5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-JSON
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: jonstanley(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bpeck@redhat.com,dmalcolm(a)redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,jlaska@redhat.com,poelstra(a)redhat.com
If you could branch this module for EL-5, it's required for Testopia, which is
currently under review.
I'd be happy to be co-maintainer for EPEL if you'd like, it builds fine as is in F9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
12 years, 7 months
[Bug 459954] New: Default clamd conf file is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Default clamd conf file is broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459954
Summary: Default clamd conf file is broken
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: amavisd-new
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: jlquinn(a)optonline.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
/etc/clam.d/amavisd.conf has syntax errors that prevent
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
amavisd-new-2.4.5-1.el5
How reproducible:
[root@mail1 ~]# service clamd.amavisd start
Starting clamd.amavisd: ERROR: Parse error at line 2: Option LogSyslog requires
boolean argument.
ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf
[FAILED]
After fixing this option to be:
LogSyslog yes
then
[root@mail1 amavisd-new-2.4.5]# service clamd.amavisd start
Starting clamd.amavisd: ERROR: Parse error at line 14: Option FixStaleSocket
requires boolean argument.
ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf
[FAILED]
Fixing this to be:
FixStaleSocket yes
allows clamd to start correctly.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 10 months
[Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433
Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: normal
Component: perl-version
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4. Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)
(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 2 months
[Bug 357641] New: EL branches
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641
Summary: EL branches
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Tk
AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Tk
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 6 months
[Bug 427049] New: broken spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049
Summary: broken spec
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Class-Std
AssignedTo: andreas(a)bawue.net
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Package doesn't build, because the perl-package split has not been reflected to it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Class-Std-0_0_8-1*
How to reproduce:
check out from CVS
make mockbuild
Additional info:
I would have fixed this bug in CVS, but you have restrictive ACLs
set on this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 9 months