[Bug 1234738] New: perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 FTBFS: gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry>
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
Bug ID: 1234738
Summary: perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 FTBFS: gpg-agent[31178]:
command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or
directory <Pinentry>
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-GnuPG
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail:
t/99.pod.t ............... ok
gpg-agent[31177]: directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d'
created
gpg-agent[31178]: gpg-agent (GnuPG) 2.1.5 started
# GPG_AGENT_INFO:
/builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent:31178:1
gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory
<Pinentry>
# Failed test 'signing'
# at t/agent.t line 101.
# got: '2'
# expected: '0'
# gpg: problem with the agent - disabling agent use
# gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode
# gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ...
# gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode
# gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ...
# gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode
# gpg: no default secret key: bad passphrase
# gpg: signing failed: bad passphrase
# Failed test at t/agent.t line 104.
# got: '2'
# expected: '0'
# Failed test at t/agent.t line 105.
# got: undef
# expected: 'EFEA4EAD'
# Failed test at t/agent.t line 106.
# got: undef
# expected: 'Mail::GnuPG Test Key <mail(a)gnupg.dom>'
gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory
<Pinentry>
# Failed test at t/agent.t line 115.
# got: '2'
# expected: '0'
Unknown Content-Type or no PGP message in body at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/blib/lib/Mail/GnuPG.pm line 404.
# Looks like you planned 20 tests but ran 8.
# Looks like you failed 5 tests of 8 run.
# Looks like your test exited with 32 just after 8.
gpg-agent[31178]: can't connect my own socket: IPC connect call failed
gpg-agent[31178]: this process is useless - shutting down
t/agent.t ................
Dubious, test returned 32 (wstat 8192, 0x2000)
Failed 17/20 subtests
Difference between working and failing build root:
gnupg2 2.1.4-2.fc23 > 2.1.5-1.fc23
tzdata 2015d-1.fc23 > 2015d-3.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 1216928] New: Wrong license declaration
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216928
Bug ID: 1216928
Summary: Wrong license declaration
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23 declares the license as "GPL+ or Artistic".
However, there are many files covered by MIT license. For example SEC.pm:
=head1 LICENSE
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided
that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising
or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific
prior written permission.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 1213823] New: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213823
Bug ID: 1213823
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
nonexistent dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
# dnf --enablerepo=f23-build install --best perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 09:46:27 2015 (3:32:54 hours old)
Error: nothing provides perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) needed by
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch
buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org robot reports:
perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro)
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) >=
0:0.06
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.06
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.05
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC)
>= 0:1.01
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC)
>= 0:0.5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 1274105] New: biber-v2.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274105
Bug ID: 1274105
Summary: biber-v2.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: biber
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: cbm(a)m.fsf.org
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cbm(a)m.fsf.org, mefoster(a)gmail.com,
novyjindrich(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Latest upstream release: v2.2
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8-12.fc23
URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 808197] New: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: powerpc
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Socket-Netlink
AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one
of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit:
t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok
# Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack'
# at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->{str} = ''
# $expected->{str} = 'FGH'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 14.
t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ......
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/14 subtests
t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok
# Failed test '$message->pack'
# at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55.
# at bytes 0-0xf (0-15)
# got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 7Â months
[Bug 671445] New: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 474630
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630
add epel option
This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new
packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old
behaviour is available under --epel option.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7Â years, 7Â months
