perl-devel June 2020

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
297 discussions

[Bug 1829984] New: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829984 Bug ID: 1829984 Summary: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding for EL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please build perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding in EPEL 8 ? It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 8. Master branch rebuilds properly against epel 8 target. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1829980] New: perl-Pod-Tests for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829980 Bug ID: 1829980 Summary: perl-Pod-Tests for EL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Pod-Tests Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please build perl-Pod-Tests in EPEL 8 ? It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 8. Master branch rebuilds properly against epel 8 target. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1781737] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Nov '20

06 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781737 Bug ID: 1781737 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-ODBC Assignee: holcapek(a)gmail.com Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: holcapek(a)gmail.com, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-DBD-ODBC. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1744424] New: perl-Gtk2-SourceView2-0.10-21.fc31 FTBFS: pkgconfig(gtksourceview-2.0) dependency does not exist
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Nov '20

04 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744424 Bug ID: 1744424 Summary: perl-Gtk2-SourceView2-0.10-21.fc31 FTBFS: pkgconfig(gtksourceview-2.0) dependency does not exist Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: perl-Gtk2-SourceView2 Assignee: thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de Depends On: 1675086 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora perl-Gtk2-SourceView2-0.10-21.fc31 fails to build in F31 because gtksourceview2/gtksourceview2-devel package was retired (bug #1675086). Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675086 [Bug 1675086] gtksourceview2: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1753543] New: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Nov '20

02 Nov '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753543 Bug ID: 1753543 Summary: perl-Font-AFM for EL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Font-AFM Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please branch and build perl-FontAFM for EPEL 8 ? It is in the dependency chain of another package I'd like to maintain in EPEL 8. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 1749132] New: Too strict gir lib search pattern
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Oct '20

31 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132 Bug ID: 1749132 Summary: Too strict gir lib search pattern Product: Fedora Version: 30 Status: NEW Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com Reporter: iamdexpl(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, ddick(a)cpan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1611740 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1611740&action=edit A less-strict template Description of problem: perli11ndoc script from perl-Glib-Object-Introspection can either display a window with a drop-down list of available GIRs or, if launched with a GIR name, find the corresponding file, parse it and dump to stdout. The latter mode has, among other things, a check whether the given argument can be a valid GIR name. However the pattern to check against is too strict. For example, it filters out GdkX11, libxfce4panel, libxfce4ui, libxfce4util and PangoFT2 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. install and of the following — pango-devel, xfce4-panel, libxfce4ui, gtk3-devel, libxfce4util 2. run perli11ndoc without arguments; ensure that the GIR matching the installed package is listed in a drop-down list 3. run perli11ndoc GdkX11 (or whatever name from that packages installed on step 1) Actual results: "Cannot recognize the library name" on stderr Expected results: contents of that GIR on stdout -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1835451] New: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in bugzilla-submit
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Oct '20

29 Oct '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451 Bug ID: 1835451 Summary: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in bugzilla-submit Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: bugzilla Severity: high Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br Reporter: atodorov(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: /usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit File "/usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit", line 38 raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found' ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Documentation says I can run this with Python 2.3 or higher and indeed the file has a python3 shebang. However it is invalid. That is a Python2 only script which clearly doesn't have any tests executed against it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bugzilla-contrib-5.0.6-3.fc31.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install bugzilla-contrib 2. /usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1823526] New: bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823526 Bug ID: 1823526 Summary: bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: bugzilla Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br Reporter: cstratak(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cstratak(a)redhat.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1783776 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0. This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here with details. For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/fedor… For all our attempts to build bugzilla with Sphinx 3.0.0, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/package/bugzi… Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Sphinx 3: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Sphinx 3 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're building the dependent packages in Copr. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783776 [Bug 1783776] python-sphinx-3.0.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1694444] New: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/ ( { <-- HERE } (?: / \* )? | \* ) / at (eval 97) line 830.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '20

19 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694444 Bug ID: 1694444 Summary: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/ ( { <-- HERE } (?: / \* )? | \* ) / at (eval 97) line 830. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: amavisd-new Assignee: juan.orti(a)miceliux.com Reporter: dac.override(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, juan.orti(a)miceliux.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org, vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated here (and will be fatal in Perl 5.32), passed through in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/ ( { <-- HERE } (?: / \* )? | \* ) / at (eval 97) line 830. They fixed it here: https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=200278 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1848125] New: amavisd fails to start in multiple port config
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Sep '20

19 Sep '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848125 Bug ID: 1848125 Summary: amavisd fails to start in multiple port config Product: Fedora Version: 32 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: amavisd-new Severity: high Assignee: j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com Reporter: dan(a)islenet.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org, vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora amavisd fails to start using recommend 2 port configuration: $inet_socket_port = [10024,10026]; # listen on multiple TCP ports The failure occurs because the selinux-policy has labelled port 10026 as for use by spamd. [root]# semanage port -l | grep spamd spamd_port_t tcp 783, 10026, 10027 Another port could be used as a workaround but it would be helpful for the amavisd and selinux team to identify another recommended port for the 2nd instance which would be properly labeled in the selinux policy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel June 2020