[Bug 1879947] New: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.16-3.fc34 FTBFS: tests
fail
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879947
Bug ID: 1879947
Summary: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.16-3.fc34 FTBFS: tests fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Perl-Ti
dy-Sweetened?collection=f34
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1868278 (F34FTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.16-3.fc34 fails to build in Fedora 34, because tests
fail:
t/csc.t ........................ ok
# Failed test 'With trailing comments: matches'
# at t/lib/TidierTests.pm line 48.
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# | Ln|Got |Expected
|
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# | 1|'method name1 { # Trailing comment |'method name1 { # Trailing
comment |
# | 2|} |}
|
# | 3| |
|
# * 4|sub name2 { # Trailing comment |sub name2 { # Trailing
comment *
# | 5|} |}
|
# | 6|' |'
|
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# Failed test 'With attribs trailing comments: matches'
# at t/lib/TidierTests.pm line 48.
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# | Ln|Got |Expected
|
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# | 1|'method name1 : Attrib(Arg) { # comment |'method name1 : Attrib(Arg)
{ # comment |
# | 2|} |}
|
# | 3| |
|
# * 4|sub name2 : Attrib(Arg) { # comment |sub name2 : Attrib(Arg) {
# comment *
# | 5|} |}
|
# | 6|' |'
|
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 36.
t/kavorka.t ....................
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/36 subtests
# Failed test 'With trailing comments: matches'
# at t/lib/TidierTests.pm line 48.
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# | Ln|Got |Expected
|
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# | 1|'method name1 { # Trailing comment |'method name1 { # Trailing
comment |
# | 2|} |}
|
# | 3| |
|
# * 4|sub name2 { # Trailing comment |sub name2 { # Trailing
comment *
# | 5|} |}
|
# | 6|' |'
|
#
+---+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
# Failed test 'With attribs trailing comments: matches'
# at t/lib/TidierTests.pm line 48.
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# | Ln|Got |Expected
|
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# | 1|'method name1 : Attrib(Arg) { # comment |'method name1 : Attrib(Arg)
{ # comment |
# | 2|} |}
|
# | 3| |
|
# * 4|sub name2 : Attrib(Arg) { # comment |sub name2 : Attrib(Arg) {
# comment *
# | 5|} |}
|
# | 6|' |'
|
#
+---+--------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 16.
t/method-signature-simple.t ....
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/16 subtests
t/moops.t ...................... ok
t/moosex-declare.t ............. ok
t/moosex-method-signatures.t ... ok
t/moosex-role-parameterized.t .. ok
t/p5-mop.t ..................... ok
t/perl-signatures.t ............ ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/bugs.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 0)
TODO passed: 23-24
t/kavorka.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 26, 28
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/method-signature-simple.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 16 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 14, 16
Non-zero exit status: 2
t/moops.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 22 Failed: 0)
TODO passed: 4, 16, 22
Files=14, Tests=185, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.03 sys + 3.84 cusr 0.55
csys = 4.49 CPU)
Result: FAIL
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8956343>. This is probably triggered
by upgrading perltidy from 20200822-1.fc34 to 20200907-1.fc34.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868278
[Bug 1868278] (F34FTBFS) - Fedora 34 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1753543] New: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753543
Bug ID: 1753543
Summary: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please branch and build perl-FontAFM for EPEL 8 ?
It is in the dependency chain of another package I'd like to maintain in EPEL
8.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1749132] New: Too strict gir lib search pattern
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132
Bug ID: 1749132
Summary: Too strict gir lib search pattern
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com
Reporter: iamdexpl(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, ddick(a)cpan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1611740
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1611740&action=edit
A less-strict template
Description of problem: perli11ndoc script from perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
can either display a window with a drop-down list of available GIRs or, if
launched with a GIR name, find the corresponding file, parse it and dump to
stdout. The latter mode has, among other things, a check whether the given
argument can be a valid GIR name. However the pattern to check against is too
strict. For example, it filters out GdkX11, libxfce4panel, libxfce4ui,
libxfce4util and PangoFT2
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install and of the following — pango-devel, xfce4-panel, libxfce4ui,
gtk3-devel, libxfce4util
2. run perli11ndoc without arguments; ensure that the GIR matching the
installed package is listed in a drop-down list
3. run perli11ndoc GdkX11 (or whatever name from that packages installed on
step 1)
Actual results: "Cannot recognize the library name" on stderr
Expected results: contents of that GIR on stdout
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1870762] New: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-SQL-Abstract
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870762
Bug ID: 1870762
Summary: EPEL8 Branch Request: perl-SQL-Abstract
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Abstract
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: igor.raits(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com,
tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I would appreciate if you could build perl-SQL-Abstract for EPEL8. I've checked
that master branch builds fine there and according to my testing works. Feel
free to add me as co-maintainer. This package and its dependencies are built in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ignatenkobrain/gdc/packages/.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1855962] New: bugzilla can't send non-html email
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
Bug ID: 1855962
Summary: bugzilla can't send non-html email
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: sjoerd(a)acm.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1700684
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1700684&action=edit
the patch
Description of problem:
Since the update to packages perl-Email-MIME-1.949-1.fc31.noarch and
perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.024-1.fc31.noarch on Fedora 31, bugzilla can't
send non-html (simple text/plain) emails anymore.
The reason seems to be a tighter control of how the method content_type_set()
is to be used. When sending non-html email, bugzilla uses a call
$email->content_type_set($parts[0]->content_type);
(BugMail.pm, line 499) where the given content_type contains the string
'text/plain; charset=UTF-8'. The content_type_set method splits on the / and
wants the second part to be a correct MIME subtype. But clearly it isn't since
it also contains a charset attribute.
The solution (what works for me) is to replace this call with two calls:
$email->content_type_set('text/plain');
$email->charset_set($use_utf8 ? 'UTF-8' : 'iso-8859-1');
Note that the code being executed is only used in case there is a single part
to be sent (i.e. not html which uses the other branch for multipart messages),
and so is definitely text/plain.
This problem occurs both in Fedora 31 and 32.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-5.0.6-3.fc31.noarch
perl-Email-MIME-1.949-1.fc31.noarch
perl-Email-MIME-ContentType-1.024-1.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1.configure bugzilla to send plain text emails (Administration -> Default
Parameters).
2.trigger bugzilla to send an email by e.g. adding or changing a bug.
3.
Actual results:
A page saying:
Invalid Content-Type 'subtype' parameter at Bugzilla/BugMail.pm line 499.
and no email being sent.
(during experimentation I added code to the report function to tell me the
content of this invalid subtype; it turned out to be 'plain; charset=UTF-8')
Expected results:
email being sent.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1835451] New: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in
bugzilla-submit
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451
Bug ID: 1835451
Summary: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in
bugzilla-submit
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
Severity: high
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: atodorov(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
/usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit
File "/usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit", line 38
raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found'
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Documentation says I can run this with Python 2.3 or higher and indeed the file
has a python3 shebang. However it is invalid.
That is a Python2 only script which clearly doesn't have any tests executed
against it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-contrib-5.0.6-3.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install bugzilla-contrib
2. /usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months