[Bug 1731721] New: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721
Bug ID: 1731721
Summary: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Font-AFM-1.20-30.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/a2ps/afm/phvr.afm
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_dire...
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 months, 4 weeks
[Bug 1731700] New: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard
locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Bug ID: 1731700
Summary: rt depends on files/directories from non-standard
locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: rt
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.noarch:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
rt-4.4.4-2.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSansFallback.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/DroidSans.ttf
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_dire...
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 months, 4 weeks
[Bug 1731718] New: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories
from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731718
Bug ID: 1731718
Summary: perl-Convert-Color depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Convert-Color
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-Convert-Color-0.11-16.fc31.src:
- /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_dire...
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 months
[Bug 2241294] New: perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-42.fc40 FTBFS: Krb5.xs:492:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241294
Bug ID: 2241294
Summary: perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-42.fc40 FTBFS: Krb5.xs:492:15:
error: implicit declaration of function
‘krb5_gen_portaddr’
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Authen-
Krb5
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Authen-Krb5
Assignee: simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, simon(a)sxw.org.uk
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-42.fc40 fails to build in Fedora 40:
gcc -c -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -flto=auto
-ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
-Wno-complain-wrong-lang -Werror=format-security
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int
-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fwrapv
-fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -DVERSION=\"1.9\"
-DXS_VERSION=\"1.9\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE" Krb5.c
[...]
Krb5.xs: In function ‘XS_Authen__Krb5_gen_portaddr’:
Krb5.xs:492:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_portaddr’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
492 | err =
krb5_gen_portaddr(context,addr,(krb5_pointer)&port,&RETVAL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Krb5.xs: In function ‘XS_Authen__Krb5_gen_replay_name’:
Krb5.xs:519:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_gen_replay_name’;
did you mean ‘krb5_set_real_time’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
519 | err = krb5_gen_replay_name(context,addr,uniq,&RETVAL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| krb5_set_real_time
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/16408679>. The failure is probably
triggered by upgrading redhat-rpm-config from 266-1.fc40 to 267-1.fc40.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241294
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
5 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 2189098] New: dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39 FTBFS: File not found: /home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/*.1*
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189098
Bug ID: 2189098
Summary: dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39 FTBFS: File not
found:
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13
-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/*.1*
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/dropbox-api-
command
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: dropbox-api-command
Severity: medium
Assignee: fedora(a)me.benboeckel.net
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora(a)me.benboeckel.net,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39 fails to build in Fedora 39:
Processing files: dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.noarch
error: File not found:
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/*.1*
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gWsKBg
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/test/fedora/dropbox-api-command
+ cd dropbox-api-command-2.13
+
DOCDIR=/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dropbox-api-command
+ export LC_ALL=C
+ LC_ALL=C
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dropbox-api-command
+ cp -pr Changes
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dropbox-api-command
+ cp -pr README.md
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/doc/dropbox-api-command
+ RPM_EC=0
++ jobs -p
+ exit 0
Executing(%license): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MDeuqJ
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/test/fedora/dropbox-api-command
+ cd dropbox-api-command-2.13
+
LICENSEDIR=/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/dropbox-api-command
+ export LC_ALL=C
+ LC_ALL=C
+ export LICENSEDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/dropbox-api-command
+ cp -pr LICENSE
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/licenses/dropbox-api-command
+ RPM_EC=0
++ jobs -p
+ exit 0
RPM build warnings:
Macro expanded in comment on line 2: (c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
Macro expanded in comment on line 2: (c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/home/test/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/dropbox-api-command-2.13-11.fc39.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/*.1*
A difference between passing and failing build roots is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15311444>, An upgrade of
perl-Module-Build-Tiny from 0.039-25.fc38 to 0.041-1.fc39 looks suspicious.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189098
6 months
[Bug 2161639] New: Pregenerated File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure
is missing a source
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
Bug ID: 2161639
Summary: Pregenerated File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure is
missing a source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-RsyncP
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: imlinux+fedora(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 199647
Classification: Fedora
perl-File-RsyncP-0.76-10.fc38 source package delivers
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/configure file which itsels was generated with
Autoconf, but the original source for Autoconf tool (configure.in according to
File-RsyncP-0.76/FileList/Makefile.PL is missing from the source archive and
thus from the source package.
While the file is licensed as FSFULL which does not require distributing
sources, it is deemed to be against Fedora spirit (and Packaging guidelines?)
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje...>.
We should either reimplement configure.in or remove this package from a
distribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161639
6 months, 1 week
[Bug 2215065] New: perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when
I'm trying to build it
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Bug ID: 2215065
Summary: perl-Coro doesn't exist in EPEL 9 and FTBFS when I'm
trying to build it
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: yaroslav(a)fedevych.name
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I'm trying to build the perl-Coro package for EPEL 9 in my COPR; apart from
missing a dependency (which can be provided easily enough), it fails its own
tests in Coro::Event by blocking forever in Event/t/01_unblock.t, which I've
able to track down to a do_timer() -> Coro::schedule call, inside of which it's
just sitting there forever in pselect() call that keeps timing out with no
events, as strace shows.
When I skip only the Coro::Event-specific problematic tests, all other tests
pass.
This is only happening in the EL9 environment. Using mock on a Fedora 38 host,
the same machine builds the exact same source package just fine on el8, f38,
and f39 with all tests passing, but freezes invariably on el9.
My COPR (jafd/perl-modules) logs show that it freezes in the same place
independently of architecture, as I build there for aarch64 and x86_64, thus
pointing at some kind of EL9-specific userspace problem.
(https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jafd/perl-modules/epel...)
I'm wondering if it's something the maintainers have run into already and thus
stopped building perl-Coro for EPEL 9. I'd like to help however I can to fix
this — if I knew how.
I've tried downgrading perl-Event to 1.27, the same version EL8 has, and it
doesn't help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215065
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
6 months, 1 week
