On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:06 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> Q2: I haven't yet checked, if perl-Test-LongString's upstream is just
> overly restrictive and if older perl(Test::Builder::Tester) modules also
> would suffice.
Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :)
Feel invited to take over or to co-maintain it - I've got enough of
other perl-modules ;)
the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the
regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in
Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString
you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all.
OK, so you are saying, ignoring the warning and continuing as if it
wasn't present is the way to go?
This would be the simplest work-around to my issue (esp. because the
running tests doesn't expose any error at all :) ).
Ralf