Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506389 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu&gt; 2009-06-18 11:11:36 EDT --- Hmmm... yeah, this should be looked at. My initial concern with splitting it off is that I'm not sure how many (or even if any) packages have this as a "silent" test requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506389 Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu&gt; 2009-06-23 02:15:37 EDT --- Oof, yeah. I've been wanting soft-deps for ages for reasons along these lines... Ok, so I've done the split and committed/built it in rawhide. The packages soft-requiring it we'll have to add it manually *sigh* unless the package maintainers add it as a test_requires (which given how many of them use Module::Install should be trivial for them to do). I've also filed bugs in rt for the ones above (RT::Client::REST can be _very_ useful) -- except for Moose itself, of course -- so hopefully we'll be seeing test_requires metadata on them soon. I also didn't file one against DBIx::Class as they're still considering Moose to be a "soft" requires. RT#47258 to 63. I'm marking this CLOSED/RAWHIDE; we'll get it out to F-11/10, but not until we're through the current mass-Moose updates, at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.