On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 19:48 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> I'm rather asking me if we should not disable "pear install"
feature ;)
>
> Ok : not all the pear extensions available in RPM.
>
> Using "pear install", you break your system coherency (file not owned
by
> any package)
Ok, point made, this was what I meant to say with "Or is trusting Pear
directly too risky?". It was just an idea for the long, long, long
term :)
Steven
