On 10/30/2009 09:57 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On 10/30/2009 01:15 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 18:42 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
On 10/29/2009 06:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I rather like the idea of standardizing on a "python3-" prefix for _all_ Python 3 module packages and subpackages, even if this leads to inconsistencies with their counterparts in the python 2 stack. It would make the "threeness" of the packages stand out more.
Thoughts?
for the
python-<package> -> python3-<package> py<package> -> python3-py<package> (I think we should keep the py to make it easier to locate stuff pygpgme) <package>-python -> python3-<package>
Seem good to me.
But there is a lot of packages installing stuff into /usr/lib/pythonX-Y/site-packages there don't fit 3 cases.
Ex. yum
It is an application, but also an python API used by other packages, how do we handle there cases.
I have attacted the the sorted output from
repoquery -f '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/*'
Tim
I have added a ordered file categorizing the packages in
Tim