On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 22:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> > I can only do very shallow testing. I think I need to actually have a
> > useful sql db locally to test any of the plotting. With the
> > defaultdict emulation I can get past the server errors and the
> > tracebacks..but there's nothing really useful going on.
> >
> > I could probably help a little more in terms of testing if the
> > development code came with a small pre-filled dummy sqlite db.
>
> Hey, guys. I've been following the thread - thanks for your excellent
> contributions and suggestions. I'm definitely going to try my hardest to
> pin down Brennan on IRC and pass everything from this thread on, if he
> hasn't been following it himself. Thanks again for everything!
>
> I know Brennan has a snapshot of Bugzilla he was using for testing of
> his implementation, and it was actually up on his server for a while,
> but unfortunately it's not any more (he has technical issues keeping it
> up). I'll definitely suggest that a sample data set be added to the
> code.

Just wanted to send another update on this - Brennan did get the code
ported to Python 2.4, and it's now up live and running on the
infrastructure servers. It's at
http://publictest14.fedoraproject.org/triageweb/ , if anyone's
interested in taking a look. I'm not sure if Brennan used the work you
guys contributed for the Python 2.4 port or re-did it himself before he
saw it, but either way, thanks a lot for your time on this! Of course,
if anyone's interested in helping develop the system further, I'm sure
Brennan would welcome the assistance.

thanks again, guys.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
Fedora-python-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-python-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-python-devel-list