On 5 October 2016 at 21:45, Tomas Orsava <torsava(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/04/2016 03:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I bring that up, as one of the other challenges with the way SCLs
> currently work is that the upstream convention of copying
> "sys.executable" into the shebang to generate a script that runs in
> the current Python doesn't work as expected.
That would be cool, but it's not planned as of yet. Maybe we should create
an RFE for it?
I think there may be one already, as I seem to recall suggesting
checking whether or not 'pipsi' works as a possible test case (pipsi =
"pip script installer", which creates a virtualenv for the installed
package and its dependencies, then ensures the virtualenv is activated
when any installed scripts are run.
However, I can't find it in a quick look at Bugzilla, so it may have
just been an email thread rather than a Bugzilla RFE.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia