On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:00 AM Petr Viktorin pviktori@redhat.com wrote:
I finally got around to this mail...
On 2020-04-19 16:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
As always, this leaves us with the name problem, but I'd very much like to use %python_provides (note the s). The only problem I see is that it is likely to be mistaken for the old one, but IMHO it shouldn't really hurt that much.
I guess something like %py_provides would also work, and maybe fit more nicely with the new generation of macros. Do you like full "python" prefix? But that's bikeshedding.
I know it's a bit of bikeshedding, but I think it's weird how inconsistent we are with using py_* vs python_*. I'd rather us just fully switch over to using python_* prefix everywhere.
It's annoying and I'd rather be verbose and clear rather than terse and confusing.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!