On 11/25/2015 09:06 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote: > Hello there, > > To package some python3-based stuff I need 'msgpack', 'llfuse', 'Cython' > modules built for Python 3.4 which is the current version of Python 3 in epel7. > > Would it be reasonable to file a bug against 'python-msgpack', et al. in epel7 > to adapt the package spec and get 'python34-msgpack' etc. packages, or there > are any objections against that? That would be the thing to do - except that for Cython this will require a new python3-Cython package for EPEL to be made and reviewed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/python-devel@lists.fedoraproje...

On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote: > Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack': > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393 > > What we actually need is to clarify and officially approve python3 epel > proposal and guidelines, to start packaging things for epel7. > > I'm ready to help out with packaging and testing python34 things, since I need > some now. > Some reviews are underway here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1294704&hide_re...

>>>> "DF" == Denis Fateyev <denis(a)fateyev.com&gt; writes:

So what should package maintainers do? I modified a package to use python3_pkgversion and it builds fine if with_python3 is set, but it doesn't seem to be set in the EPEL 7 build environment. I noticed a couple packages enable it by default. Is that what we should be doing? Or should we just build it into python/python3_epel7 in copr for now, and it so how?