On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> I've just submitted
>>
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
>>
>> This update does two things:
>>
>> - Updates python to version 2.7.11
>> - Splits out the python macros into separate packages
>>
>> It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with
>> these packages installed.
>
> This might be the cause of a recent failure to build Pacemaker while
> other Fedoras (24 + 25) were OK:
>
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13522053
>
> See
>
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2053/13522053/mock_output.log
>
>> Package python-macros is obsoleted by python-rpm-macros, but
>> obsoleting package does not provide for requirements
Subsequent build succeeded, though:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750257
So it must have been an intermittent issue.
Can this be prevented next time a basic build dependency
is restructured? Or would it require additional support
in the build infra?
I tried to investigate this a little bit.
6 days ago, at around the point the build failed, several overrides
for the build root have been requested:
python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23
redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1
python-2.7.11-2.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-2.fc23
All but the last, expired on 2016-04-01, appear active at the moment.
The last one was superseded with python-2.7.11-3.fc23:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-3.fc23,
which is also active right now.
But clearly, at the moment of the linked build that failed,
python-rpm-macros and redhat-rpm-config were overridden whereas
python-macros-2.7.10-8.fc23+ wasn't. It looks to me I hit a racy
window in which python-2.7.11-2.fc23 override hasn't yet been
applied.
And later, at the moment of the linked build that succeeded,
no such override was active.
I would conclude, please be more careful about management of
overrides to prevent this kind of mess-ups.
Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic
(non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not?
--
Jan (Poki)