23 Apr
2008
23 Apr
'08
4:56 a.m.
"JM" == José Matos writes:
JM> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine whether it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions welcome.
JM> AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9 JM> release. Also all modules need to be recompiled, this can be done JM> best after F-9.
I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing, have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding, including (but probably not limited to) rpy.
Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9 is released.
Alex