On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:35, Alex Lancaster wrote:
Well, it's broken again! Grr.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189946
Would it be possible to hold back the upgrade of the R release until you have heard from maintainers of dependent packages like (JosÃ) that they know to rebuild their packages, or rebuild it for them?
Either way would prevent "yum upgrade" breaking, which it is right now.
Yesterday was public holiday here...
The fix is not as straight forward as I would like: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8338-rpy-0....
I will investigate further...
Alex
PS: I have subscribed to fedora-r-devel-list now.
PPS: It would be interesting to announce this mailing list in some of the other lists. Just an idea.
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:18, Jose' Matos wrote:
The fix is not as straight forward as I would like: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8338-rpy-0 .4.6-8.fc6/
I will investigate further...
Fixed. The fix was easy. :-)
As I suspected the cause is displayed in the release notes of R:
o The version string shown in the startup message and by "R --version", and that stored in variable R.version.string are now in exactly the same format.
$ R --version R version 2.3.0 (2006-04-24) ...
previously "version" was not there (first line).
I had also to fight with the (inter)dependence between texinfo and tetex.
BuildRequires texinfo implies tetex for FC-4 and FC-5 but not for FC-3 and FC-6. :-)
All versions have been built now and they should be available in the next iteration of Extras.
r-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
José Abílio Matos