rel-eng February 2010

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
169 discussions

#3422: Tag request gstreamer-0.10.26.2-1.fc13 for dist-f13-updates-candidate
by Fedora Release Engineering 19 Feb '10

19 Feb '10

#3422: Tag request gstreamer-0.10.26.2-1.fc13 for dist-f13-updates-candidate ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: company | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Component: koji | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ {{{ gstreamer-0.10.26.2-1.fc13 is required to build the corresponding plugin packages. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3422> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

#3419: Remove geronimo-specs from F14/rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering 19 Feb '10

19 Feb '10

#3419: Remove geronimo-specs from F14/rawhide ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jjohnstn | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- The package geronimo-specs should be removed from F14/rawhide. It is being replaced by geronimo-jta and geronimo-jms packages. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3419> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3417: Please block smashteroid from F-13 and rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

#3417: Please block smashteroid from F-13 and rawhide ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jwrdegoede | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Hi, I've gotten a mail from upstream that they have been contacted by Intellivision that smashteroid looks too much like Astrosmash. So upstream has ceased distributing smashteroid and asked us to do the saem. Thus please block smashteroid from F-13 and rawhide, I'll mark it as a dead.package and retire it in pkgdb. Thanks, Hans -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3417> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 1

#3418: I need a buildroot override for gnome-desktop-2.28.2-5.fc12
by Fedora Release Engineering 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

#3418: I need a buildroot override for gnome-desktop-2.28.2-5.fc12 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mclasen | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ I need to build control-center and nautilus against this version so that I can ship them all three together in one update. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3418> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 0

#2012: Build root isolation
by Fedora Release Engineering 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

#2012: Build root isolation ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: stransky | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Please isolate buildroot from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1534857 I need to check the build error (It's produced by koji only, local builds went fine). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2012> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

Re: Spins late TM approval
by Jeroen van Meeuwen 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

On 02/18/2010 04:09 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> wrote: > <snip> >> >> The list of spins at this moment in time is at: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Fedora_13 >> >> 9 of these are to be included in the Release, excluding Desktop and KDE >> which for some reason are outside of the Spins SIG's processes completely. > <snip> > > Why exactly are these two excluded from the spins process? > I can't think of any reason. -- Jeroen

2 1

Re: Spins late TM approval
by Jesse Keating 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:09 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > Why exactly are these two excluded from the spins process? Because they have been granted permanent spin status by the board. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

2 1

Spins late TM approval
by Paul W. Frields 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

Re: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-February/00797… Through an oversight, the Board hadn't addressed TM approval for the new Security Spin. If the Board were to approve it tomorrow (slightly late according to the published schedule), would that cause any problems for the Infrastructure, Release Engineering, or QA teams? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com

4 6

Bodhi NFR stable mash bug
by Josh Boyer 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

I think I figured out why bodhi is trying to mash f13-updates (maybe). There seems to be a bug in the repo detection when we resume. The code looks like: for update in self.updates: release = update.release # [No Frozen Rawhide] Don't mash stable repos for pending releases if update.request == 'stable' and release.locked: continue if self.resume: self.repos.add(release.stable_repo) self.repos.add(release.testing_repo) elif update.request == 'stable': self.repos.add(release.stable_repo) <snip> So I think what happened is that on the first push attempt it correctly skipped f13-updates. However, since the bodhi configs were all horked due to permissions, we had to resume the push. The above code seems to skip f13-updates initially, but then blindly add it in the resume case (I think). I'm not sure we actually want to mash f13-updates right now. I could create the f13-updates.mash file really easily, but that seems like the incorrect action to do. If bodhi is fixed for this bug, we could roll out a new one and then resume the push again. I don't really know of another solution to our current problem. josh

2 1

No Frozen Rawhide help
by Paul W. Frields 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

Hi Docs team, The release engineering team needs our help with some wiki revamping. Specifically Rawhide, our development branch for software packages, has changed in the Fedora 13 cycle, pursuant to what we call the "No Frozen Rawhide" (NFR) proposal. In the past, changes in Rawhide would slow as we got into the testing (Alpha, Beta) phases for a release. In theory, fewer changes would be allowed in the closer we get to release, and those allowed in would be subject to more scrutiny, to stabilize the release. As a result, right after the release is composed and tested successfully, Rawhide would be unblocked like a dam, and the resulting flood of changes would typically result in an unusable Rawhide for some time while people pick up the wreckage and fix things. Pursuant to NFR, we've just branched for Fedora 13 early, and separated that branch from Rawhide. Rawhide is now carrying those packages that will be in Fedora 14, about 9 months from now. As a result, we can apply a higher level of scrutiny to the Fedora 13 branch, while Rawhide will continue to roll on, only hopefully without a point of massive breakage. A team of people gathered last Friday to put together explanations of how this scheme works, and how it affects people in various categories, including packagers, testers, mirror admins, and others: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan What we need now is for a few people to help with fixing wiki pages, most of which have been listed here on that page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Existing_Doc… You don't need to be an experienced Rawhide user or tester to understand the information on this page. But if there are any questions, everyone on the crew who participated in the NFR conference last week is available on IRC to answer questions. What do you need to do? * Show up on IRC Freenode at #fedora-docs -- instructions for doing that are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_IRC * Ping me, "stickster," and tell me you want to help. I'll get you started on a specific page. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com

1 0

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng February 2010