fujiwara reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
I'd submit the request to unretire input-pad again:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/input-pad/
I put review_url in the previous request but I think it's not needed since two weeks is not passed yet.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6748
kevin opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
add missing double quote so the end of the script functions
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/210
kevin reported a new issue against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
% git grep sigkeys
fedora-atomic.conf:sigkeys = ['FDB19C98', 'E372E838'] # None = unsigned
fedora-cloud.conf:sigkeys = ['FDB19C98', 'E372E838'] # None = unsigned
fedora-docker.conf:sigkeys = ['FDB19C98', 'E372E838'] # None = unsigned
fedora-modular.conf:#sigkeys = ['FDB19C98', 'E372E838'] # None = unsigned
fedora-modular.conf:sigkeys = [None]
fedora.conf:sigkeys = ['F5282EE4']
Should now atomic, cloud and docker be using the f27 key? (I understand that modularity isn't signing yet).
This for example prevents hardlinks between cloud and the rest of the trees...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/208
rdieter reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
Recently, baloo was orphaned/retired erroneously and caused broken deps. The error was caught an and it was unretired quickly, so please unblock (for f26).
See also,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437119
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6752
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Release Engineering on 2017-04-17 from 09:30:00 to 10:30:00 US/Central
At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Fedora Release Engineering weekly meeting
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/5873/
richardfearn reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
I [submitted a new `jsr-305` package for EPEL 7](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-dc4100e54a), but subsequently found (via a comment on that update) that `jsr-305` is already in RHEL 7.
So I [retired the package on the `epel7` branch](https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/jsr-305.git/commit/?h=epel7), but I think this stopped me from being able to unpush the update.
The "update has reached 14 days in testing" comment was automatically added to the update earlier today, even though I don't want it to be pushed to stable at all.
Is there a way to unpush this update?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6753
ralph opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
Bring back i386 for modules.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/203
ralph opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
Try producing a docker base-image from the base-runtime.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/207
ralph opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
The name of this script has a typo.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/206
pbrobinson opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
add initial support for aarch64 disk images for Minimal/Workstation/Server
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/204