ignatenkobrain reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Please review https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking change.
P.S. I don't think that any actions from rel-eng are needed. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
jkurik added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` A note from Change Wrangler: This Change proposal requires mass rebuild. The deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild has passed two weeks ago (June 19th). I will leave the decision whether this can still be accepted to the F29 scope on RelEng team as I do not have clear visibility how much work this might bring. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jkurik, ohh! There is nothing needed from releng, just if something fails entirely, second mass rebuild would be needed. But I don't expect that. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @ignatenkobrain When is this change going to land? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
ignatenkobrain added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mohanboddu As soon as change is approved. Everything is ready for that. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @ignatenkobrain Then I am going to hold off on this whether we should include it in mass rebuild or not until the change request is processed. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
pmatilai added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Last I looked (less than a year ago), libtool still doesn't play well with -Wl,--as-needed and needs some sort of patch/hack to either libtool itself or %configure to overcome the reordering problem, I don't think it's fixed upstream (after all these years, sigh). See eg https://sigquit.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/why-asneeded-doesnt-work-as-expecte... and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347650. It's still unfixed upstream AFAIK.
Note that I'm certainly not objecting to this change, just pointing out that merely adding -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS wont work for a significant number of packages. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
syeghiay added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @ignatenkobrain , what is the status of this request? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
The issue: `F29 System-Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking` of project: `releng` has been assigned to `mohanboddu` by syeghiay.
The status of the issue: `F29 System-Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking` of project: `releng` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by mohanboddu.
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This change has landed on redhat-rpm-config-116-1 and redhat-rpm-config-118-1 which were built on Jul 10th and Aug 15th of 2018.
Not including it in mass rebuild as its not needed anymore. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Igor Gnatenko -
Jan Kurik
-
Mohan Boddu
-
Panu Matilainen
-
Suzanne Yeghiayan