September 2008 - rel-eng - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora Release Engineering] #719: Half-bug: the SHA1SUM files are generated in text mode (instead of binary)

by Fedora Release Engineering

#719: Half-bug: the SHA1SUM files are generated in text mode (instead of binary) ---------------------------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: Роман Донченко <DXDragon(a)yandex.ru> | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji ---------------------------------------------------------+------------------ {{{ Hello. I questioned this in the #fedora IRC channel first, and was advised to mail you, so here I am. Basically, the SHA1SUM files (e.g. http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/9/Fedora/i386...) are generated using text mode (sha1sum -t, since on Unix it's the default). So if I try to verify the sums with the Windows port of sha1sum, it tries to open the ISOs in text mode, which leads to check failing. Hence, suggestion: generate future SHA1SUMs with `sha1sum -b` instead. Regards, Roman. }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/719> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #790: Please unblock sysklogd in dist-f10

by Fedora Release Engineering

#790: Please unblock sysklogd in dist-f10 -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: kanarip | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 10 Preview | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- sysklogd is blocked for dists-f10, but has been re-introduced (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450275) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/790> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #791: Please remove gchempaint from devel

by Fedora Release Engineering

#791: Please remove gchempaint from devel ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: belegdol | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: mash Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- This package has reached its end of life since it has been merged with gnome-chemistry-utils. Please block it from the collection. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/791> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

PackageKit failure: PolicyKit timeout?

by Warren Togami

Reproduce Procedure: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/ltsp/beta1/i686/ Install F9 + updates as of early August from this Live image. Update to PackageKit and fedora-release from: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/updates/f9-updates.jktest/ Minor Bug... 1) Two PK icons in the tray after upgrade to PackageKit-0.2.5. (Inconsistent.) Pretty serious bug... 2) Red and white dialog box tells me there are security updates available. * Click "Install All Updates". Walk away for 30 minutes. * When I get back, I see a pop-up asking if I want to import the key. Yes/No. I click Yes. * It asks for the root password. I type the root password. * It pops up again asking if I want to import the key. I click Yes. * PackageKit Error The install task could not be requeued More details role unknown for reque http://togami.com/~warren/temp/policykit-error.png * At this point it appears that PK failed, but it is actually updating packages in the background while the dialog shows a failure and the other dialog makes it appear that it finished. Some kind of PolicyKit timeout? It isn't fatal, but it is very confusing and a user is likely to do something stupid because they are not aware that the update is still going in the background. Warren Togami wtogami(a)redhat.com

15 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #789: Inheritance of iwl4965-firmware (and iwl5000-firmware)

by Fedora Release Engineering

#789: Inheritance of iwl4965-firmware (and iwl5000-firmware) ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: kwizart | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ A new build of the firmware (that has dropped the ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 ), is needed within the repositories because the re-introduction of iwl4965.ko within the the ppc/ppc64 kernels. Since iwl4965-firmware in Rawhide (iwl4965-firmware-228.57.2.21-3) has drop one of the deprecated version of the firmware, Inheritance will need to be helped to go from F-8 to F-9 for this package. This package need to be inherited in the F-9 repository (only) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl4965-firmware-228.57.2.21-1.1 iwl5000-firmware-5.4.A.11-3 , built from F-8, need to be inherited to F-9 and Rawhide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl5000-firmware-5.4.A.11-3 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/789> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #762: mediawiki-openid-0.8.2-7

by Fedora Release Engineering

#762: mediawiki-openid-0.8.2-7 --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: athimm | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | --------------------+------------------------------------------------------- Hi, this package had been built for F7 and was intended to be inherited. Unfortunately a runtime dependency was still in the review queue, so it was withdrawn from the collection. Could you please add it for F-8 -> devel as an inherited package? Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/762> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #742: libswt3-gtk2.i386 and deps into F-8 x86_64

by Fedora Release Engineering

#742: libswt3-gtk2.i386 and deps into F-8 x86_64 -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: orion | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Can we get libswt3-gtk2.i386 and deps (antlr, gjdoc, and java-1.4.2-gcj- compat) into F-8 x86_64? IDL's version of eclipse requires it to run. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/742> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #758: Tag libpri-1.4.6-1.fc8

by Fedora Release Engineering

#758: Tag libpri-1.4.6-1.fc8 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jcollie | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Please tag libpri-1.4.6-1.fc8 for F-8 so that I can rebuild Asterisk and CallWeaver. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/758> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora Release Engineering] #759: Remove preload-0.6.1 from updates-testing of F8 and F9

by Fedora Release Engineering

#759: Remove preload-0.6.1 from updates-testing of F8 and F9 -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: behdad(a)behdad.org | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Those eat babies. I release 0.6.3 already and that's in rawhide, but I'd rather not push it in F8 and F9. I mailed Marc (package maintainer) to remove them but he has not done yet. They can take your machine to its knees: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457335 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/759> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

15 years, 8 months

1
1
0 / 0

Re: Package kit traceback with new keys

by M A Young

Warren Togami wrote: > I tested PackageKit-0.2.5 and gnome-packagekit on two i386 F9 systems. > It seems to DTRT. > > Anybody have a F9 x86_64 system to test this on? This really should be > verified. It works for me on F9 x86_64 if I run gpk-update-viewer by hand. What I have not yet seen is the icon telling me that updates are available, which makes me wonder if there is some other problem somewhere. Michael Young

15 years, 8 months

3
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng September 2008