andreamanzi reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Name of the package? python2-django1.11
* FAS username of the new maintainer? andreamanzi
* Any extra information?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8486
rishi reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
`go-md2man` is an utility used to convert Markdown to UNIX manuals. It's used as a BuildRequires by `podman` and `toolbox`. It used to be provided by the `golang-github-cpuguy83-go-md2man` package, which recently got renamed to `golang-github-cpuguy83-md2man`. Even though the old package was retired, the new one hasn't made it to the build roots for some time.
Would it be possible to tag the new package into the F31 build root?
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
As soon as possible to unblock dependent builds.
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
Dependent packages can't be built.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8488
======================================
#fedora-meeting-2: RELENG (2019-06-27)
======================================
Meeting started by mboddu at 16:01:00 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2019-06-26/releng.2019…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* EPEL8 (mboddu, 16:04:18)
* We are at a position to build the packages in epel8 in stg koji
(mboddu, 16:05:38)
* mboddu is testing stg bodhi, but the composes seems to get stuck in
'Requested' state, cverna is looking into it (mboddu, 16:05:54)
* mboddu will work on pungi config for epel8 beta and will create the
nightly compose scripts for testing (mboddu, 16:11:11)
* We will update fedpkg and fedscm-admin to support requesting epel8
branches (mboddu, 16:26:24)
* Open Floor (mboddu, 16:28:33)
* Cloud composes are back to working and except for armv7 container
composes are also working, pbrobinson is looking into the armv7
issue (mboddu, 16:44:04)
Meeting ended at 16:48:34 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mboddu (60)
* nirik (39)
* dustymabe (14)
* zodbot (8)
* cyberpear (3)
* tdawson (3)
* tyll (0)
* puiterwijk (0)
* masta (0)
* jednorozec (0)
* pbrobinson (0)
* pingou (0)
* ksinny (0)
* maxamillion (0)
* sharkcz (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
tibbs reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
So I know I used to be able to untag a package but now that fails due to me not having autosign permissions (and probably other things).
Today I merged a PR against redhat-rpm-config but wasn't able to test it sufficiently locally due to my local rawhide box not having received gcc 8 yet. I foolishly built it anyway and immediately broke all of rawhide. 100% my fault. It's a one line fix, but I can't untag it and nobody is online with permissions to do so.
Since as of late I have been doing a number of changes to that and other related packages which can potentially break all of rawhide/fedora/epel, it would be useful for me to be able to untag in case something goes wrong.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7288
merlinm reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
The `avocado` module in F30 currently has two streams (`52lts` and `69lts`) without default profiles specified.
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
Users will always have to manually specify a specific installation profile when installing the `avocado:52lts` or `avocado:69lts` module streams for F30.
The PR for this is https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/pull-request/116
Note: the above PR _does not_ modify the `avocado` default stream or the default profile for the default stream.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8460
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Release Engineering on 2019-06-26 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Fedora Release Engineering weekly meeting
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9274/
churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
Recently, i deal with a lot of nonrepsonsive packagers and people ask to be assigned to those. I open releng tickets. It's a bit tedious. I cannot imagine how tedious this is for releng.
Can I please be granted permission to reassign packages to different users? This might be the cvsadmin group. I'm already a provenpackager and I would only use this once the nonrepsonsive packager process is approved by FESCo.
* When do you need this? The sooner the better.
* When is this no longer needed or useful? This is always useful.
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? A lot of releng tickets from me.
Thank you.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7753
raphgro reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
* Describe the issue
Unorphan python-pdfkit and assign me as the new maintainer. Upstream is active and there's a new version provided on PyPi.
No idea why orphaned but this package is still useful In Fedora.
* When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD)
ASAP
* When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD)
ASAP
* If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact?
none
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8484
otaylor reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following:
``
urw-base35-fonts doesn't have f29/f30 branches. This, apparently, hasn't been noticed since nobody tried to rebuild it since the f29 mass rebuild when f29 was on master.
(This causes some problems for including it in the flatpak-common module, since it needs to point either to master or to the EOL f28 branch, in addition to whatever problems it will eventually cause for the package maintainre.)
From irc:
<otaylor> anybody have an idea why urw-base35-fonts doesn't have f29/f30 branches in distgit?
15∶34
<mboddu> otaylor: Probably because, it didn't had a master branch in pdc and got skipped while branching, please file a ticket and I will create the master branch
https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/?global_compon…
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8485