noon
atim reported a new issue against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following:
``
Hello. i686 version of [mangohud](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mangohud) package not
available for download on x86_64 systems. Can we add it to whitelist manually please?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
5:29 a.m.
kparal added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This was fixed by #936 , right?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
5:36 a.m.
atim added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@kparal i though it should fixed by #936 but for some reason i still don't see i686
version. 🤷♂️
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
5:43 a.m.
kparal added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
It is available in Rawhide:
```
$ sudo dnf list --available --showduplicates mangohud --releasever=rawhide --repo=fedora
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:33 ago on Mon 25 Jan 2021 12:41:18 PM CET.
Available Packages
mangohud.i686 0.6.1-1.fc34
fedora
mangohud.x86_64 0.6.1-1.fc34
fedora
```
but not in Fedora 33:
```
$ sudo dnf list --available --showduplicates mangohud --releasever=33 --repo=fedora
--repo=updates
Last metadata expiration check: 1:58:10 ago on Mon 25 Jan 2021 10:44:53 AM CET.
Available Packages
mangohud.x86_64 0.5.1-1.fc33
fedora
mangohud.x86_64 0.6.1-1.fc33
updates
```
I don't know the reason. Ping @mohanboddu .
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
8:52 a.m.
kparal added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Quoting from [this
email](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorapr...:
> A whitelisting of some package can be requested here:
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issues
For rawhide, and branched (prerelease) yes, changes likely would need to be there.
For updates its the infrastructure ansible repo.
So, IMHO, tickets for this should be filed as releng tickets
and folks should note which they are talking about above.
So it seems if you want it to happen in F32 and F33, you need to request it in:
https://pagure.io/releng/
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
11:59 a.m.
kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Right, the updates and compose processes are different and use different configurations.
Fixed in ansible should be in the next updates push.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
11:59 a.m.
The status of the issue: `No 'mangohud' in multilib` of project: `pungi-fedora`
has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by kevin.
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
12:29 p.m.
mohanboddu added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Right, the updates and compose processes are different and use
different configurations.
Fixed in ansible should be in the next updates push.
Thanks Kevin, I think I forgot to add it to updates config.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:52 p.m.
atim added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Thanks a lot for help with this.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:55 a.m.
kparal added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
The package is there :smile: :tropical_drink:
```
$ sudo dnf list --available --showduplicates --releasever=33 --repo=fedora --repo=updates
--refresh mangohud
Available Packages
mangohud.x86_64 0.5.1-1.fc33 fedora
mangohud.i686 0.6.1-1.fc33 updates
mangohud.x86_64 0.6.1-1.fc33 updates
```
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:58 a.m.
atim added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
👍🏻 Now it's time to improve build and made automagic installation 32-bit version if
i686 packages already installed on end user system...
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:33 p.m.
kevin added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
👍🏻 Now it's time to improve build and made automagic installation
32-bit version if i686 packages already installed on end user system...
We don't really have any way to know that... :) If you can think of a better heuristic
than the ones we are using, do let us know.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:33 p.m.
The status of the issue: `No 'mangohud' in multilib` of project: `pungi-fedora`
has been updated to: Open by kevin.
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
2:33 p.m.
The status of the issue: `No 'mangohud' in multilib` of project: `pungi-fedora`
has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by kevin.
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/811
1201
days inactive
1530
days old
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
13 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Artem Polishchuk -
Kamil Páral
-
Kevin Fenzi
-
Mohan Boddu