On 06/28/2010 05:28 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:07 -0400, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
>
>> Hey, so I spent far too long over the last few days trying to get
>> activerecord v2.3.8 to compile against Fedora before I realized that I
>> was basing my attempt off the wrong package.
>>
>> Specifically, we have two activerecord rpms in Fedora, ruby-activerecord
>> and rubygem-activerecord
>>
>>
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ruby-activerecord/
>>
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-activerecord/
>>
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-activerecord
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rubygem-activerecord
>>
>>
>> Obviously, conforming to standards, rubygem-activerecord is the way to
>> go, and I can't figure out why we are keeping ruby-activerecord around,
>> especially since its horribly out of date (pulling version 2.0.1, the
>> package itself has not been updated since 2007).
>>
>> Can we orphan / remove ruby-activerecord all together?
>>
> Since nobody's been complaining, I think the answer is yes. Feel free to
> nuke it (together with ruby-activesupport)
>
> David
>
>
>