Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:15 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was released upstream
> and we should land it in Fedora. Unfortunately, the change proposal
> was approved just last Thursday and on top of that, rebase of libffi
> broke Ruby (I am going to disable the failing test cases for the
> moment and hope for the best). So this brings us into situation,
> where won't have enough time prior Fedora Mass rebuild. I have
> discussed this a bit with relengs and one of the options would be to
> build Ruby early during the mass rebuild and fix the outfall later. I
> shared the proposal in the Fedora Mass rebuild ticket [2]. One
> downside would be that in case of problems, we could not trigger our
> contingency plan, which is "drop our side tag". But I hope we won't
> need that.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> My fist concern is that maybe we should build more then just Ruby.
> rubygem-json
Hm, I should probably really bump the Release of rubygem-json,
otherwise we'll be in troubles. Previously, we were typically lucky
that the independent package had lower NVR, this time, it wins.
> comes to my mind and possibly rubygem-nokogiri?
Ha, it is not nokogiri but thread_order :facepalm:
V.
And Nokogiri is RSpec dependency, that is the reason to prioritize it.
Vít
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040380
>
> [2]
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10538#comment-775197
>