Hi Steve,
thank you for your reaction.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Traylen" <steve.traylen(a)cern.ch>
To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:32:53 PM
Subject: Prep, build and install
Hi,
I noticed the link to the new ruby packaging draft and had a comment.
Currently the guidelines suggest to do everything basically within
prep with build and install empty.
Not really - the guidelines say, that you should use %prep for the gem install command
(which basically unpacks the gem into a proper directory structure) and %install to place
the files precisely where we need to under %{buildroot}.
Can it be considered to break this up into the prep build and
install
sections.
The gem can unpacked in prep and im hoping its possible to build and
then install from that unpack...( i dont know how to do this or if
is possiblE?)
I think that it wouldn't make much sense - the install command in %prep does
everything we need - unpacks the gem into a proper directory structure (and compiles the
binary extension, if any). This way you can use %prep to apply patches and then, if you
need to recompile a patched C extension (if any), the %build section is the place to do
it. Otherwise, I see no point in using %build section with rubygems.
In the current situation it is not obvious how you would apply a
patch in the rpm and probably more importly the "rpmbuild -bp",
"rpmbuild -bc" or "rpmbuild -bi" do not have there normal meaning.
Yes, well, if you have nothing to compile, it makes perfect sense to leave the %build
section empty, doesn't it? And you use %prep to unpack the gem and %install to place
it into a proper directory structure. What's wrong with that? I think that it works
exactly as it should.
Regards,
Bohuslav.
--
Steve Traylen
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig