Jun Aruga wrote on 12/15/17 15:12:
Aleksandar,
> Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile and
having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can be changed, no
guideline about removing items.
I am not familiar with mini_portile. I have only used it a few times
in my past time. Maybe.
https://github.com/flavorjones/mini_portile
I think it is possible to update the document by yourself if you like.
The document is not updated since January 2015.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
I just know about that mini_portile discrepancy and I don't agree with
it. The thing is whoever takes the decisions to ban some dependencies an
make incompatible changes to document it for future reference.
> Below document might be useful for you to update document.
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Reporting_problems_with_Docs
>
> Jun
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Aleksandar Kostadinov
> <akostadi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Jun Aruga wrote on 12/15/17 13:47:
>>>
>>> Alexander,
>>>
>>>> Do we have a requirements document about ruby packaging? I'm all for
>>>> avoiding upstream incompatibilities which we are currently not doing for
>>>> some reasons. And having an official requirements document will make
more
>>>> clear what is a bug and what is a feature.
>>>
>>>
>>> We have a document for Ruby packaging here.
>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
>>
>>
>> Thank you. What I can't spot in there is requirements around mini-portile
>> and having gem dependencies match these of upstream. I see that version can
>> be changed, no guideline about removing items.
>>
>>> Below is a proposed document for Ruby 2.5.
>>> The section Detailed Description might be close for the requirement.
>>> But I think that there is NOT requirement document for Ruby 2.5 as far
>>> as I know.
>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.5
>>>
>> ...
>
>
>