On 27/04/17 12:10, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26.4.2017 v 16:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 26.4.2017 v 14:06 Dominic Cleal napsal(a):
>> Would setting ownership or admin automatically provide commit access to
>> members of ruby-packagers-sig?
>>
> I assume that once the group is added as an admin of the package, then
> every member of the group can adjust his/her rights. If the group has
> commit bit, then every member of the group can commit. If I am right,
> then it really depends what is the best practice here. Because this
> means to answer questions such as: "how much credit we want to give each
> contributor", because somebody might be proud to be listed explicitly as
> a maintainer and somebody else probably does not care.
So if I get this [1] right (and actually I discussed this with Pingou on
IRC), then the ideal setup should be:
1) Group cannot be administrator, so there have to be at least one
explicit "human" administrator (this is to prevent individual from the
group to take control over the package).
2) Group should have commit bit, this allows everybody from the group to
do changes to package in dist-git.
I wasn't able to set this on rubygem-Ascii85 in PkgDB, it showed an error:
User "ruby-packagers-sig" is not in the packager group
3) Group should have "watchbugzilla" to allow group to be
notified about
BZ associated with the package.
And when trying to set just watch*, PkgDB showed another error:
User "ruby-packagers-sig" could not be found in FAS
Have you been able to update ACLs to the group on any packages? I was
using the PkgDB page at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/rpms/rubygem-Ascii85/give/ to
try and grant access.
--
Dominic Cleal
dominic(a)cleal.org