On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Michal Fojtik <mfojtik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 16/02/11 16:52 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>* rspec - 1.3.0 -> 2.0.1 (stahnma)
>
>> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
>> many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
>> to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
>> Also please check bug650283
>>
>>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
>> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>>
>
>Could we push this forward? Can I help somehow? It is quite late for F15
>unfortunately, is it wort of trying? RSpec 1.3 are not very useful for
>Rails 3 IMO.
Keep in mind that many packages are using 1.3 tests which are in some way
incompatible with 2.0, so before pushing this be sure it will not break all
builds which are using 1.3 ;-)
-- Michal
>
>
>Vit
>_______________________________________________
>ruby-sig mailing list
>ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, mfojtik(a)redhat.com
Deltacloud API:
http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
We may want to look at doing rspec2 as a new package. Lots of things
are still using rspec 1.x, specifically many gems not related to
rails. I should probably do some research on this and see how many
are left on 1.x.
Either way, I'll see if I can get a scratch build of rspec 2 going.
I'm also completely willing to give co-maintainer rights to anybody
who wishes to help out.
stahnma