Dne 21.9.2011 13:43, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'd like to bring to your attention that there was proposed by Ruby SIG
> meeting as part of FUDCon Milan [1]. I would like to take this meeting
> as change to discuss Ruby future in Fedora. Here are few point I'd like
> to discuss:
>
> * Ruby 1.9.3 for F17. I have already pre-prepared feature page [2] for
> this and I am working towards packaging Ruby 1.9.3. However, there are
> several issues including
> - How to correctly name and version subpackages such as RubyGems,
> RDoc, Rake, IRB
> - How to maintain updates of them late.
> - Directory structure.
>
> * Support of gems for MRI and JRuby.
> - Is it possible to share RubyGems?
> - Is it possible to share gems?
>
> * Support of multiple versions of gems on single installation, e.g.
> Rails 2 vs Rails 3.
>
> * Refresh of Ruby Packaging Guidelines
> - They do not always follow best practices
> - They will need to be updated because of Ruby 1.9.3
>
> * gem2rpm future and possible extensions
>
> This is list is not exhaustive, so please feel free to add few more
> points, which you think might be interesting to discuss.
>
> Vit
>
>
>
> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Milan_2011
> [2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
I have to add few more points immediately:
* Rails 3.1 for F17
* Migration of RSpec to RSpec 2.x
Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig Another idea:
We should get rid of the .gem in cache subfolder, which makes no sense
for RPM.
Vit