Hi,
I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR
in
Pagure.
OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.
I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning.
But the macro variable is defined as a module scope.
Ref.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/perl.yaml#_161
%{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct.
I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and also
refer above Perl's logic.
%{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}
Jun
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
> > To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
> >
> >
> >
>
I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR
in
> > Pagure.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> >
> > Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working for ruby module.
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
> >
> > I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
> dtrace
> > command), such as below macro.
> >
> > %global with_rubypick 1
>
> Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
> Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
>
%{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
>
> And then override it on module to 0.
>
> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Pavel
>
> >
> > Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not
> right
> > now.
> >
> > Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
> >
> > Jun
>
--
Jun Aruga jaruga(a)redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
Republic