Hey all,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is the way how we should proceed, i.e. the 1.9.2 should become
default. Later we can consider what to do with 1.8 ...
I wonder what do you guys think about the Debian approach:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/05/msg00105.html
Looks like a win win.
Replacing 1.8 does not mean that they cannot be installed in parallel I
guess.
It's my first email to the list. My apologies If I'm being to brave.
Greetings to all!
Rgds.
Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig