Obviously if I was convinced we really need it, I'd did that
without asking.
I do not think that someone is using the independent "rubygems" package.
It's a legacy of old Ruby that does not bundle rubygem in it.
But I like that if you want to retire this kind of key package, just
share us what you will do on this mailing-list, before your work to
retire.
Then I am fine.
Jun
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:09 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,
The independent "rubygems" package was retired, because it FTBFS already
for some while:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygems/c/366607586d95b505277165fce54...
Now I wonder, do we care? Should I unretire it while there is a chance
to do it without review or we don't care and we are fine with the
bundled version shipped in Ruby? Obviously if I was convinced we really
need it, I'd did that without asking. So what are your opinions?
Vít
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...
--
Jun Aruga | He - His - Him
jaruga(a)redhat.com / IRC: jaruga