Sorry for the belated response. It seems like there are a few API
changes but nothing that we can't handle so no objections to updating
On 06/26/2012 01:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
just googling around randomly, it seems that there are no problems with upgrade to Rails
I have already built 3.2.3 as an SCL  and run it with no problems whatsoever.
----- Original Message -----
> Have there been rails 3.2 rpms built? And what do Rails 3.0 -> 3.2
> upgrade stories look like upstream? Might be worth considering
> this off for another Fedora release or two to let things shore up /
> settle down.
> On 06/21/2012 10:59 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
>> Please do.... :)
>> honestly im not using rails from fedora, yes its old but we are
>> seeing so many releases in such a short time thats challenging to
>> up with 3.2.x , please jump directly to 3.2.6
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
>> <bkabrda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18  - I
>>> figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting
>>> quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be
>>> glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before
>>> submitting the feature to FESCo.
>>> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
>>>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2
>>> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig mailing list