Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/15/2016 12:35 AM:
>
>
> Dne 14.9.2016 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>> Hello, Vít:
>>
>> Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/13/2016 12:01 AM:
>>> When I did the last snapshot, I mentioned, that Tcl/Tk was moved into
>>> gem. But upstream took step further and dropped the Tcl/Tk support
>>> from
>>> the Ruby stdlib entirely. The tk gem is the only option now. Hence I
>>> dropped the subpackage as well. The only caveat is that there is not
>>> good place to obsolete this package. I figured out that I place the
>>> obsoletes into ruby-libs to remove the ruby-tcltk package from the
>>> system, but if you have any better idea, please let me know.
>>>
>> Perhaps packaging ruby/tk is the smartest:
>>
https://github.com/ruby/tk
>>
>> Looks like the git log or so, the above seems to be exactly the
>> replacement
>> for previously rubylib Tcl/Tk.
>
> Yes, it should be drop in replacement as far as I understand it.
>
>> If you don't have time, I may try packaging in a week or two weeks.
>
> If I am not mistaken, there is nothing in Fedora, what would depend on
> ruby-tcltk, so for me it is very little priority. Thank you if you are
> going to pickup the maintenance.
>
Sorry for very looooooong delay, however not I've submitted
review request for rubygem-tk:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409355
Just wondering about the "Obsoletes: ruby-tcltk < 2.4.0". Have you
tested it against the Ruby 2.4? Should I remove the "Obsoleted" from the
ruby-libs?
Vít