On 16/02/11 16:52 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
* rspec - 1.3.0 -> 2.0.1 (stahnma)
> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
> many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
> to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
> Also please check bug650283
>
>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>
Could we push this forward? Can I help somehow? It is quite late for F15
unfortunately, is it wort of trying? RSpec 1.3 are not very useful for
Rails 3 IMO.
Keep in mind that many packages are using 1.3 tests which are in some way
incompatible with 2.0, so before pushing this be sure it will not break all
builds which are using 1.3 ;-)
-- Michal
Vit
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, mfojtik(a)redhat.com
Deltacloud API:
http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------