On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
'rubygem(rspec)'
rubygem-ffi-0:1.0.9-2.fc16.src
rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
aeolus-conductor-devel-0:0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires
rubygem-rspec
rubygem-daemon_controller-0:0.2.6-2.fc17.src
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --arch=src --whatrequires rubygem-rspec
The only remaining packages are:
rubygem-ffi (bkearney) - seems to be just packaging bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760009
rubygem-linode (stahnma) - upstream is already RSpec 2.x compatible,
it is FTBFS currently and it would deserve update anyway
aeolus-conductor-devel (mmorsi, clalance, sseago) - Hm, are
rubygem(rspec-rails) 2.6 compatible with RSpec 1.x? I doubt it ...
rubygem-daemon_controller (pwu) - It seems there should not be issue
running with RSpec 2.x, although I did not tested it.
Could we move forward and let the rubygem-rspec to follow the upstream
RSpec version and Require: rubygem(rspec-core)?
+1, lets move forward with this. I'm in the process of updating the
aeolus-conductor codebase to work against ruby 1.9.3 and will look into
incorporating an update to rspec 2 into this.
Since linode, ffi, and daemon_controller have been taken care of and
we've long announced the update to rspec2 in F17, lets perform the final
cutover. If there are issues going forward, we can easily introduce a
rspec1 compat package.
-Mo