On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:23 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 13:40 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dne 03. 12. 21 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've rebuilt it in my ruby-testing COPR:
>>>
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/2999821
>>>
>>> And I'm also rebuilding dependent packages (`ruby-devel` for now) in
>>> the rubygems-testing COPR:
>>>
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/builds/
>>> (starting with build 3000168)
>>
>> Nice, thx.
>>
>>
>>> I'll let you know in case there're build failures.
>>
>> There apparently are build failures.
>>
>> 1) It will probably need some bootstrap round, but
> Sure, I'll run the builds several times & build the most needed
> packages manually (I also have a script for that; maybe it works).
> Reliable build results will come after that.
>
>> 2) There seems to be something wrong with the binary extensions:
>>
>>
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pvalena/rubygems-testi...
>>
>> That might be actually related to the issues I had with building rbs and
>> debug gems. I'll need to investigate.
Interesting, trying eventmachine locally, it works ....
There may be newer versions of some gems in my COPR.
Vít
> Thanks!
> Pavel
>
>>
>> Vít
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pavel
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:57 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> There were quite a lot of stuff happening, such as OpenSSL 3.x support,
>>>> which kept me away from looking at Ruby 3.1. But now is the highest
time
>>>> and here is the PR you can follow:
>>>>
>>>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/106
>>>>
>>>> The scratch build if succeeds is available here:
>>>>
>>>>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79519429
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I have not done any testing except build.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And here are a few notes.
>>>>
>>>> * -preview1 was not building due to some dependency issues. Therefore I
>>>> went for more recent revision.
>>>>
>>>> * OpenSSL 3.x support is still not finished.
>>>>
>>>> * The good news is that there was removed one long standing patch [1].
>>>>
>>>> * The bad news is that RBS and debug gem are not building [2].
Therefore
>>>> older version of RBS is used and debug gem is completely omitted ATM.
>>>>
>>>> * Because Ruby ships more and more stuff as bundled gems, I have
>>>> introduced *ruby-bundled-gems* package, because packaging the gems on
>>>> their own does not scale anymore.
>>>>
>>>> * dbm/gdbm support was removed from StdLib, therefore also the
>>>> gdbm-devel dependency was dropped.
>>>>
>>>> As always, please give it a try and let me know if you discover any
issues.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vít
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob/36708f00de18db...
>>>>
>>>> [2]
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18373
>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraprojec...
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure