Dne 11.5.2012 15:30, Emanuel Rietveld napsal(a): > Hi, > > I'm getting ready to start working on Rails 3.2.3 for F18 (maybe) > and > EPEL 6 (for sure). > > Just wondering if anybody has already tried to package it and found > any gotchas you could make me aware of. Maybe we can share work. > > Emanuel > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig Hi, There are several dependencies of Rails 3.2 already submitted for review: 738746 - rubygem-coffee-script-source 738744 - rubygem-execjs 738742 - rubygem-coffee-script Bohuslav Kabrda has prepared also other needed SRPMs as far as I know. So the stalled reviews is the biggest issue ATM I would say.

Vit _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

On 05/14/2012 07:34 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Dne 11.5.2012 15:30, Emanuel Rietveld napsal(a): >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm getting ready to start working on Rails 3.2.3 for F18 (maybe) >>> and >>> EPEL 6 (for sure). >>> >>> Just wondering if anybody has already tried to package it and >>> found >>> any gotchas you could make me aware of. Maybe we can share work. >>> >>> Emanuel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ruby-sig mailing list >>> ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig >> Hi, >> >> There are several dependencies of Rails 3.2 already submitted for >> review: >> >> 738746 - rubygem-coffee-script-source >> 738744 - rubygem-execjs >> 738742 - rubygem-coffee-script >> >> Bohuslav Kabrda has prepared also other needed SRPMs as far as I >> know. >> So the stalled reviews is the biggest issue ATM I would say. >> > Yep, tried to package, no real problems. There were few issues I > ran into from the packaging point of view: > - Choosing a proper JavaScript runtime - all the ones provided as > gems do lots of bundling, so they are not ideal. Fortunately, > there is a "js" package (mozilla spidermonkey), that is already > packaged in Fedora and can be used, so we can go with it (maybe we > could make it a hard dependency of Rails until we provide some > other engines that users can choose from?). It seems the server-side js dependency is pulled in via coffeescript, so an alternative solution would be to remove that dependency for the time being (since nodejs and execjs haven't made it into Fedora yet).

> - Another thing we should probably think of are "asset" > dependencies (jquery-rails, coffee-rails, sass-rails), that should > be added as Rails dependencies, because they are in the default > Gemfile of new rails applications. Could we remove these from the default Gemfile? This way the new rails project creation would be a minimal install, and developers could expand it from there. Which Fedora version are you targeting the updated Rails rpms?

-Mo

On 05/14/2012 07:34 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Yep, tried to package, no real problems. There were few issues I ran > into from the packaging point of view: > - Choosing a proper JavaScript runtime - all the ones provided as > gems do lots of bundling, so they are not ideal. Fortunately, there > is a "js" package (mozilla spidermonkey), that is already packaged in > Fedora and can be used, so we can go with it (maybe we could make it > a hard dependency of Rails until we provide some other engines that > users can choose from?). > - Another thing we should probably think of are "asset" dependencies > (jquery-rails, coffee-rails, sass-rails), that should be added as > Rails dependencies, because they are in the default Gemfile of new > rails applications. > - Last problem that I ran into is, that bundler by default installs > newest versions of all gems when creating a new Rails application. > Therefore I applied a patch (attached) to Railties, that prevent this > by only searching local gems. > Would you mind putting up some WIP .src.rpms ? Thanks Kind Regards, Emanuel _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig