Hi guys, I would like to ask anyone of you, who has the ACLs to rubygem-cucumber, to update it to the latest upstream. I need it for a new gem aruba, which we need to run tests for rubygem-factory_girl_rails. I have filled a bugzilla on this [1], but Jeroen is not responding and I saw that there is plenty of you having the ACLs, so could someone please do it? :) Thanks a lot.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:01:12PM -0400, Mo Morsi wrote: > On 03/27/2012 03:05 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I would like to ask anyone of you, who has the ACLs to > > rubygem-cucumber, to update it to the latest upstream. I need it > > for a new gem aruba, which we need to run tests for > > rubygem-factory_girl_rails. I have filled a bugzilla on this > > [1], but Jeroen is not responding and I saw that there is plenty > > of you having the ACLs, so could someone please do it? :) > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Is the newest release backwards compatable (eg no unintended > breakage as > far as you know)? Don't have too many cycles these days but if you > want > to apply for commit rights I can give those too you or > alternatively if > you have a rubygem-cucumber SRPM I can just push that for you. I chatted with kanarip earlier and he pushed 1.1.9 into testing.

-- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:09:03AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > I chatted with kanarip earlier and he pushed 1.1.9 into testing. > > Great, thanks! Be sure to give the package karma when you use it. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

On 2012-03-29 7:25, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Hmm I'm getting: > > Could not find gherkin (~> 2.9.0) amongst [...] > Seems that Jeroen forgot to check the dependencies. Would anyone be > against updating gherkin as well? It won't need other dependencies > and > nothing else depends on gherkin either, so I think upgrading it > shouldn't break anything. I have no objections - I've failed to update gherkin myself though I haven't really examined the error closely, but I think it needs a little more patching. Sorry for the inconvenience - let me know when you're done and I can bump the RPM-level Requires on rubygem-cucumber. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com m: +44 74 2516 3817 w: http://www.kolabsys.com

On 2012-03-29 11:18, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > so I was able to run all the cucumber features, but I'm still > experiencing 6 spec failures, reported here [1]. > Please hold cucumber in testing until I manage to update gherkin. ACK. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com m: +44 74 2516 3817 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08

One more thing, could you please request buildroot override for cucumber in F17? I need it to build gherkin properly :) Thanks!

Hi Jeroen, sorry I forgot to give you the heads-up, I have already pushed gherkin, so please push the cucmber, too.