Dne 23. 01. 22 v 12:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 22. 01. 22 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/01/22 20:28:
>> Hello, ruby-sig folks:
>> So looks like there is really a lot of rebuild failure on rubygems
>> packages - and many of them contains:
>> Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb
>> + umask 022
>> + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb: line 31: syntax error near unexpected token
>> RPM build errors:
>> I just noticed this, I will perhaps investigate what has happened, but
>> if someone can take a look at this beforehand, I really appreciate it.
>> Maybe... (just a guess) this is related with
>> I may be wrong.
> So this is
> Vít seems already aware of this, thanks.
> So we'll have to rebuild lots of rubygems packages again...
Right, this is hopefully fixed. I'd wait for rel-engs if they are
going to give second shot to failed builds.
Relengs has resubmitted all the failed builds. So the number of failed
ruby packages looks much better. Looking at failed packages , a naive
FF search gives me 58 packages prior deduplication, this is reasonable
IMO and corresponds with the state reported by Koschei.
BTW it seems that the side tag should be merged today, but there are
still some rebuild to finish.
> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: