Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote, at 08/12/2010 05:22 PM +9:00:
Michael Stahnke wrote:
> I will drop a quick word of encouragement to also maintain branches in
> EPEL5/6. If you are unable to due to technical reasons, I understand
> (needs a newer rubygem(rack) or rails or something). If there are
> other reasons holding you back from getting ruby packages into EPEL,
> contact me and I'll likely offer to maintain in the EPEL branches.
Same here, please opt in to EPEL branches, and let us know if/when you're
unable to fulfill the task. I'm sure either someone can help you out, or co-
maintain the package for EPEL -and like Michael said, if there's technical
reasons this mailing list is the place to ask for help.
For any packages I maintain on Fedora branches, please feel free to take ownership
for EPEL branches.