Hi all, the packages mentioned in the subject will need to be retired for Ruby 1.9.3/F17 and replaced by rubygem-{linecache,ruby-debug,ruby-debug-base}19. I'm writing here because I think it might be faster than filling bugzillas, so please, kanarip and mamoru, will you retire the packages? Thanks a lot!

On 2012-02-08 10:04, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 8.2.2012 09:53, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): >> Hi all, >> the packages mentioned in the subject will need to be retired for >> Ruby 1.9.3/F17 and replaced by >> rubygem-{linecache,ruby-debug,ruby-debug-base}19. I'm writing here >> because I think it might be faster than filling bugzillas, so >> please, >> kanarip and mamoru, will you retire the packages? >> >> Thanks a lot! >> > > One alternative might be to update these gems to their "19" > versions > without name change? I don't like the idea of new review for every > Ruby major version. > ACK, +1, please feel free to overwrite the non-19 versions with their 19-version version. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen

On 2012-02-08 12:57, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 2012-02-08 10:04, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> > Dne 8.2.2012 09:53, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): >> >> Hi all, >> >> the packages mentioned in the subject will need to be retired >> >> for >> >> Ruby 1.9.3/F17 and replaced by >> >> rubygem-{linecache,ruby-debug,ruby-debug-base}19. I'm writing >> here >> >> because I think it might be faster than filling bugzillas, so >> >> please, >> >> kanarip and mamoru, will you retire the packages? >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> >> > >> > One alternative might be to update these gems to their "19" >> > versions >> > without name change? I don't like the idea of new review for >> > every >> > Ruby major version. >> > >> >> ACK, +1, please feel free to overwrite the non-19 versions with >> their >> 19-version version. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jeroen van Meeuwen >> > > Great. BTW, I wrote you an email about rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - we > need to replace it by rubygem-net-ldap and retire > rubygem-ruby-net-ldap. Would you please retire the package? > I noticed, but I was otherwise occupied. Have you already obsoleted/provided rubygem-ruby-net-ldap in the rubygem-net-ldap package? Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen

On 2012-02-08 13:08, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > The package is awaiting review: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787665 It (the review) has to be successfully completed, the package build and the build be tagged into anything that is being distributed anywhere before we can retire what it replaces. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen

On 2012-02-08 10:04, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 8.2.2012 09:53, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): >> Hi all, >> the packages mentioned in the subject will need to be retired for >> Ruby 1.9.3/F17 and replaced by >> rubygem-{linecache,ruby-debug,ruby-debug-base}19. I'm writing here >> because I think it might be faster than filling bugzillas, so >> please, >> kanarip and mamoru, will you retire the packages? >> >> Thanks a lot! >> > > One alternative might be to update these gems to their "19" > versions > without name change? I don't like the idea of new review for every > Ruby major version. > ACK, +1, please feel free to overwrite the non-19 versions with their 19-version version. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen

Dne 8.2.2012 09:53, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): > Hi all, > the packages mentioned in the subject will need to be retired for > Ruby 1.9.3/F17 and replaced by > rubygem-{linecache,ruby-debug,ruby-debug-base}19. I'm writing here > because I think it might be faster than filling bugzillas, so please, > kanarip and mamoru, will you retire the packages? > > Thanks a lot! > One alternative might be to update these gems to their "19" versions without name change? I don't like the idea of new review for every Ruby major version. Vit _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig