On Thursday, March 15, 2012 09:10:23 AM Spencer R. Shimko wrote:
Are you thinking of something significantly different from the secstate effort?
There is a lot of overlap between what is shipped with RHEL and secstate. We have had teleconferences on combining codebases somewhat, but that was a long time ago. We can restart that discussion if you want, but not on this mail list.
Sounds good. We'll sync up separately.
I think the topic at-hand focuses on requirement content and remediation content - not the tools.
I thought secstate was a tool and not content. Is there more to secstate than code? I might have missed that.
As of right now I think this list is the best place to have those conversations.
For content, sure.
However if the general sentiment of the list is that remediation needs to be discussed elsewhere (since it won't be SCAP) I'll happily move it to the CLIP mailing list.
Is that where you discuss the secstate code? I was thinking of the openscap mail list which is where all the previous discussion of secstate/openscap code merging occurred. :)
-Steve