Hey Guys Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things: (1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP: (2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options: I'm not sure how/why this is happening. The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/... _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org

On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote: > On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote: >> Hey Guys >> >> Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted >> to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the >> installer, and noticed a few things: >> >> (1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP: >> >> >> (2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options: >> >> >> I'm not sure how/why this is happening. >> >> The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the >> profile description field? >> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/... >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scap-security-guide mailing list -- >> scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org >> > Hey Shawn, > ad (2) this is known issue > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106 > > For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, > and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen > http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). > Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the > extending one. Is it a bug? This is not a bug. To replace extended description, extending description element should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.

> > Marek > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org

On 8/3/17 11:35 AM, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote: > On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote: >> On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote: >>> On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote: >>>> Hey Guys >>>> >>>> Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted >>>> to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the >>>> installer, and noticed a few things: >>>> >>>> (1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP: >>>> >>>> >>>> (2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options: >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how/why this is happening. >>>> >>>> The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for >>>> the profile description field? >>>> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> scap-security-guide mailing list -- >>>> scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>> scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org >>>> >>> Hey Shawn, >>> ad (2) this is known issue >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106 >>> >>> For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, >>> and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen >>> http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). >>> Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the >>> extending one. Is it a bug? >> This is not a bug. >> To replace extended description, extending description element >> should have attribute override="true", like the title element has. > Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not > expected to be appended to description of OSPP Profile. IMHO it comes down to the profiles not including "override=true" in the profile descriptions. Never knew they were needed. How come we didn't have this problem in earlier editions of oscap-anaconda? The profiles don't seem to have override=true in the description field, but in prior RHEL releases things were OK.