----- Original Message -----
From: "Amit Saha" <asaha(a)redhat.com>
To: "The Science and Technology Special Interest Group mailing list."
<scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 9:07:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Scitech] Fedora 20 Scientific Packages Testing
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paulo César Pereira de Andrade"
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com>
> To: "The Science and Technology Special Interest Group mailing list."
> <scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 8:53:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Scitech] Fedora 20 Scientific Packages Testing
>
> 2013/9/8 Amit Saha <asaha(a)redhat.com>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I posted an update on the Fedora 20 Scientific Spin on a blog post
> > yesterday. [1]
> >
> > The key update is that:
> >
> > I have created a Wiki page [3] where I want to list scripts/other ways to
> > sanity test
> > the various packages/applications that are being shipped.
> >
> > So, can I please request you all in downloading the 32-bit or 64-bit TC5
> > spin from here[2]
> > and see if *your* tool/library of interest is working as expected? And
> > also
> > please add the "test" to the Wiki page?
>
> Can you add sagemath to the kickstart file? The iso is already large
> enough, and
> contains most requires anyway.
> There are some known problems in the sagemath package (most notably
> currently
> is the jmol plugin not working after the last java security updates;
> static image
> generation with jmol works), but no packaging problems should exist, sans a
> few
> windows of time in rawhide, since it was added to fedora.
Sure,I am testing a build now. I will add it once it's done.
Added 'sagemath' and 'sagemath-notebook' to the package list.
I added it, but ran into issues with the dependency check. Filed a bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006230
So, I have excluded it from the kickstart for now. If this gets fixed soon,
I will add it back.
Thanks,
Amit.
--
Amit Saha <
http://echorand.me>