Hi, Why does scalapack need mpich-devel-static if using OpenMPI? Might it be possible to add the MPI compiler wrappers as well? Benson On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've been working on the following COPRs: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi3.1/ > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi4.0/ > > And collecting notes on problems here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jBK_lnsOMcAsgGj8qr0-1Db6wtiegrFQE... > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U2YobgRn592CFoiKBxCFvCNTf0vqozTyV... > > Many of the 4.0 builds fail because I've left in (for now) the default > dropping of the MPI1 API. That affects a bunch of things. I've filed > some upstream bugs on many of the issues. > > There are some worrying "Illegal instruction" failures on Fedora Rawhide > x86_64 builds for a number of packages that I haven't yet tracked down. > > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 > NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com > Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ > _______________________________________________ > scitech mailing list -- scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@lists.fedoraproject... >

Hi, Thanks for maintaining these packages. Usually the compilers do not show up as the location is not usually one which is on the default path. /usr/local/bin (I think /usr/bin is not for Fedora packages) is probably a better place for the compiler wrappers, since this is usually on the default Path, but /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/ is not on the default path. Benson -- On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, at 10:02 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm simply rebuilding the full packages from Rawhide - I'm not disabling > mpich though I suppose I might if needed. > > I don't know what you mean by "Might it be possible to add the MPI > compiler wrappers as well?" openmpi-devel contains them: > > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpiCC > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpic++ > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpicc > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpicxx > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpif77 > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpif90 > /usr/lib64/openmpi/bin/mpifort > > and so forth. > > > On 11/30/18 9:14 AM, Benson Muite wrote: > > Hi, > > Why does scalapack need mpich-devel-static if using OpenMPI? > > Might it be possible to add the MPI compiler wrappers as well? > > Benson > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, at 3:24 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> I've been working on the following COPRs: > >> > >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi3.1/ > >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/openmpi4.0/ > >> > >> And collecting notes on problems here: > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jBK_lnsOMcAsgGj8qr0-1Db6wtiegrFQE... > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U2YobgRn592CFoiKBxCFvCNTf0vqozTyV... > >> > >> Many of the 4.0 builds fail because I've left in (for now) the default > >> dropping of the MPI1 API. That affects a bunch of things. I've filed > >> some upstream bugs on many of the issues. > >> > >> There are some worrying "Illegal instruction" failures on Fedora Rawhide > >> x86_64 builds for a number of packages that I haven't yet tracked down. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Orion Poplawski > >> Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 > >> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > >> 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com > >> Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> scitech mailing list -- scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@lists.fedoraproject... > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > scitech mailing list -- scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to scitech-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@lists.fedoraproject... > > > > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 > NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com > Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ >

Hi Orion, On Tue, Dec 4, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Thanks.

On 12/4/18 10:07 AM, Dave Love wrote: If Fedora has as an online spreadsheet, sure. But I'm not interested in dealing with wiki formatting. I'd completely forgotten about that - definitely worth looking at. My main purpose for the COPRs was to test readiness for updating Rawhide, distributing for older releases a secondary benefit. -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/