selinux March 2023

selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
9 discussions

Setting context in early boot
by Frederick Grose 11 Dec '25

11 Dec '25

I have a general scoping question on setting SELinux context on files/directories during early boot. I'm working on a feature in dracut to implement general stacking of filesystem hierarchies via OverlayFS for the root filesystem within the dmsquash-live-root module. How should I address the setting of context for new files, directories, or links needed to assemble the components for the OverlayFS mount? For example, when I mkdir -m 0755 -p --context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /run/somemountpoint I get this warning in the journal: mkdir: warning: ignoring --context; it requires an SELinux/SMACK-enabled kernel If the SELinux code is not active at this early stage, what is to be done?

3 3

SELinux is preventing systemd-tmpfile from using the sys_resource capability.
by Manfred Lotz 31 Jul '25

31 Jul '25

Hi there, Running Fedora 31 and SELinux still in permissive mode I got SELinux is preventing systemd-tmpfile from using the sys_resource capability. ***** Plugin sys_resource (91.4 confidence) suggests ********************** If you do not want processes to require capabilities to use up all the system resources on your syste> Then you need to diagnose why your system is running out of system resources and fix the problem. According to /usr/include/linux/capability.h, sys_resource is required to: /* Override resource limits. Set resource limits. */ /* Override quota limits. */ /* Override reserved space on ext2 filesystem */ /* Modify data journaling mode on ext3 filesystem (uses journaling resources) */ /* NOTE: ext2 honors fsuid when checking for resource overrides, so you can override using fsuid too */ /* Override size restrictions on IPC message queues */ /* Allow more than 64hz interrupts from the real-time clock */ /* Override max number of consoles on console allocation */ /* Override max number of keymaps */ Do fix the cause of the SYS_RESOURCE on your system. ***** Plugin catchall (9.59 confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that systemd-tmpfile should have the sys_resource capability by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c 'systemd-tmpfile' --raw | audit2allow -M my-systemdtmpfile # semodule -X 300 -i my-systemdtmpfile.pp I also see type=AVC msg=audit(1569414241.452:321): avc: denied { sys_resource } for pid=17409 comm="systemd-tmpfile" capability=24 scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_tmpfiles_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_tmpfiles_t:s0 tclass=capability permissive=1 type=AVC msg=audit(1569414241.452:322): avc: denied { setrlimit } for pid=17409 comm="systemd-tmpfile" scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_tmpfiles_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_tmpfiles_t:s0 tclass=process permissive=1 I have to admit I don't know how to judge this. Before I do anything here I like to understand. -- Manfred

5 5

Not possible to specify smtp password for setroubleshootd?
by Matt Kinni 09 Jun '24

09 Jun '24

Hello, I run a Fedora 35 server and would like setroubleshootd to send email alerts for avc denials, but I'm having trouble configuring this due to the apparent lack of support for configuring an smtp password. The out of the box setroubleshoot.conf sets > smtp_host = localhost > smtp_port = 25 > from_address = SELinux_Troubleshoot , but there is no config parameter for smtp password. For this to actually work on a machine acting as an MTA (I have postfix running locally), the mail server would have to be configured to allow unauthenticated port 25 connections to masquerade as any local system user, which no decent postfix setup would allow. I am not a python programmer, but in my reading of https://pagure.io/setroubleshoot/blob/main/f/framework/src/setroubleshoot/e…, it doesn't appear there is any built in way to support authenticated email sending despite the underlying smtplib being able to do it. I would suggest either a) adding password support for smtplib, or/and b) adding an option to send mail using the sendmail binary, which allows postfix to recognize the running user without any password needed. Has anyone else run into problems deploying the setroubleshootd email alerts in practice? email_alert.py appears simple enough to hack in password support, but I feel a security oriented project like selinux shouldn't require an insecure mail setup in order to send its alerts. Any tips are welcome, Thanks, Matt

2 4

get rid of setenforce
by Henry Zhang 09 Jun '24

09 Jun '24

Hi folks, setenforce allows users to swap selinux mode between enforcing and permissive. If I want my selinux to stay in enforcing mode forever so that nobody is able to interfere with my selinux. What should I do? Thanks. ---henry

5 13

certmonger post-save scripts & certmonger_unconfined_t domain
by Sam Morris 06 Jun '24

06 Jun '24

Certmonger allows for the configuration of a post-save command to be run after it has obtained new certificates. This can be used to copy the key & certificates out of wherever certmonger is allowed to put them, and save them elsewhere with a particular owner/group, combine the certificate & chain into a single file as required by some software, etc. The problem comes with SELinux which prevents my post-save scripts from being able to do all of that. I thought the solution was to give the scripts the context of certmonger_unconfined_exec_t, which would cause a transition to the certmonger_unconfined_t domain which is as its name suggests unconfined; but I can't get this to work. I'm trying to use runcon to simulate certmonger executing a fake script: # cat /tmp/fakescript #!/bin/bash set -eu id -Z # /tmp/fakescript unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 # ls -Z /tmp/fakescript unconfined_u:object_r:certmonger_unconfined_exec_t:s0 /tmp/fakescript # runcon system_u:system_r:certmonger_t:s0 /tmp/fakescript runcon: ‘/tmp/fakescript’: Permission denied Here is the avc denial: ---- type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(27/04/21 16:16:47.156:153492) : proctitle=runcon system_u:system_r:certmonger_t:s0 /tmp/fakescript type=SYSCALL msg=audit(27/04/21 16:16:47.156:153492) : arch=x86_64 syscall=execve success=no exit=EACCES(Permission denied) a0=0x7ffd8aa768ab a1=0x7ffd8aa75888 a2=0x7ffd8aa75898 a3=0x0 items=0 ppid=177795 pid=177796 auid=sam.admin uid=root gid=root euid=root suid=root fsuid=root egid=root sgid=root fsgid=root tty=pts5 ses=103 comm=runcon exe=/usr/bin/runcon subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null) type=AVC msg=audit(27/04/21 16:16:47.156:153492) : avc: denied { entrypoint } for pid=177796 comm=runcon path=/tmp/fakescript dev="dm-0" ino=33563064 scontext=system_u:system_r:certmonger_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:certmonger_unconfined_exec_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0 Even though: # sepolicy transition -s certmonger_t -t certmonger_unconfined_t certmonger_t @ certmonger_unconfined_exec_t --> certmonger_unconfined_t Diving in a little deeper, I can see that certmonger can execute the file: # sesearch -s certmonger_t -t certmonger_unconfined_exec_t -c file -p execute -A allow certmonger_t certmonger_unconfined_exec_t:file { execute execute_no_trans getattr ioctl map open read }; ... and that the file type is an entrypoint for the certmonger_unconfined_t domain: # sesearch -s certmonger_unconfined_t -t certmonger_unconfined_exec_t -c file -p entrypoint -A allow certmonger_unconfined_t certmonger_unconfined_exec_t:file { entrypoint execute getattr ioctl lock map open read }; ... and that transition is permitted from certmonger_t: # sesearch -s certmonger_t -t certmonger_unconfined_t -c process -p transition -A allow certmonger_t certmonger_unconfined_t:process transition; Which leaves me scratching my head, unsure why it doesn't work in practice... -- Sam Morris <https://robots.org.uk/> PGP: rsa4096/CAAA AA1A CA69 A83A 892B 1855 D20B 4202 5CDA 27B9

2 4

How is the upstream SELinux refpolicy tied into Fedora?
by David Sommerseth 04 Apr '23

04 Apr '23

Hi, I had an upstream SELinux pull-request merged in autumn 2020 [1]. But I still don't see this SELinux boolean flag (renamed [2] to "dbus_pass_tuntap_fd") present in Fedora 38. So I wonder how the SELinux refpolicy is consumed into Fedora's SELinux policies ... when can I expect to see this in Fedora and RHEL SELinux policies? [1] <https://github.com/SELinuxProject/refpolicy/commit/79c7859a4807236693c73442…> [2] <https://github.com/SELinuxProject/refpolicy/commit/ba3818ebcc3a627bc331c61a…> -- kind regards, David Sommerseth OpenVPN Inc

4 13

Label for executable in tmp
by Aleksei Bedniakov 31 Mar '23

31 Mar '23

Hi, I have a case with script which connects via ssh, transfers executable to /tmp folder and tries to run it. SELinux is blocking the execution, which is expected behavior from a security perspective. Simple way is to create a rule `allow user_t user_home_t:file { execute };` execution, but I am unable to affect the user_t or process_t in my case. And that it is not secure to allow too wide execution rights for the /tmp folder. I believe this scenario is common, but still unable to find a way to properly handle this. Is there a proper way to do this? Thanks!

1 0

foresee rules needed
by Henry Zhang 27 Mar '23

27 Mar '23

Hi folks, Is there any way to foresee any new rule should be allowed? Now I have to wait for QA reporting new denied message from /var/log/audit/audit.log Any suggestions? --henry

1 0

OTA talks to cloud
by Henry Zhang 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

Hi folks, My device wants to talk to the cloud for OTA. And I do: allow axxxxxx_t self:fifo_file rw_fifo_file_perms; allow axxxxxx_t self:unix_stream_socket { create_stream_socket_perms connectto }; What else should be allowed? Thanks. ---henry

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

selinux March 2023