Who matters in the Server Working Group ? You do! At the last meeting Miloslav raised the issue that some people feel that not being a voting member of the working group is perceived as not having their opinion valued and may discourage participation. Luckily for us we have quite a few participants that didn't get that nonexistent memo and are providing great contributions to the Fedora Server project. The role of WG voting members is that of "public servants". They take it upon themselves to do some of those boring tasks that are required in any group or organization. To get the bureaucracy out of the way of the "do-ers", and when needed work as arbiters. So far this seems to have been working quite well, and it is hard to recall a contentious issue that has required official WG members votes to move forward. In general the Server WG works by consensus among all participants, regardless of status on or off of the Working Group. The ones that 'do' are the ones that have a greater impact than anyone else (even on the WG). We really welcome any point of view. The developers among the participants know they have some blind spots when it comes to user- friendliness or prioritization of features. This is why we like to have a diverse representation in the Working Group. We also have to work on non-code matters so any help in any area, be it testing, marketing, advocacy, documentation, localization, etc.. is extremely welcome. So if you have ideas around the Fedora Server product and want to help in any way please feel free to show up in the mailing list[1], on IRC channels[2], participate in our weekly IRC meeting[3] and in general get in contact and share. SWG [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server [2] #fedora-server on freenode IRC [3] #fedora-meeting-1 on freenode IRC, Tuesdays at 1600 UTC