Who matters in the Server Working Group ? You do! At the last meeting Miloslav raised the issue that some people feels that not beeing a voting member of the working group is perceived as not counting and may discourage participation. Luckily for us we have a quite a few participants that didn't get the memo and are giving great contributions to the Fedora Server project. The role of WG voting members is that of "public servants". They take on themselves to do some of those boring tasks that are required in any group or organization. To get the bureaucracy out of the way of the do-ers, and in case of need work as pacifiers. So far this seem to have been working quite well, and it is hard to recall a contentious issue that has required official WG members votes to move forward. In general the Server WG works by consensus among all participants, regardless of the technical status of their membership. The ones that 'do' are the ones that have a greater impact than anyone else. But we really welcome any point of view. The developers among the participants know they have some blind spots when it comes to user frindliness or prioritizing features, this is why we like to have a diverse representation in the WG, we also have to work on non-code matters so any help in any area, be it testing, marketing, advocacy, documentation, etc.. is extremely welcome. So if you have ideas around the Fedora Server product and want to help in any way please feel free to show up in the mailing list, on IRC channels, participate in our weekly IRC meeting and in general get in contact and share. SWG