7:07 p.m.
Hello,
What's the roadmap for Puppet more recent version to be part of Fedora?
Current puppet version is 0.25.5 which is 1,5 year old.
Same thing for EPEL.
Puppet version jumped to 2.6 after 0.25.5 and is now 2.7.
Whatever the latter change meant for the distrib in terms of dependencies, I haven't
found anything relevant in discussion groups/bugzilla.
Regards
7:15 p.m.
On 09/13/2011 01:07 AM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote:
Hello,
What's the roadmap for Puppet more recent version to be part of Fedora?
Current puppet version is 0.25.5 which is 1,5 year old.
Same thing for EPEL.
Puppet version jumped to 2.6 after 0.25.5 and is now 2.7.
Whatever the latter change meant for the distrib in terms of dependencies, I haven't
found anything relevant in discussion groups/bugzilla.
puppet-2.6.6-1 is still in -testing:
F15: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-3581
EPEL6: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-2861
- Athmane
7:25 p.m.
Great, thanks for the news.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Athmane Madjoudj" <athmane(a)fedoraproject.org>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:15:43 AM
Subject: Re: Puppet more recent version
On 09/13/2011 01:07 AM, Gilles Dubreuil wrote:
Hello,
What's the roadmap for Puppet more recent version to be part of Fedora?
Current puppet version is 0.25.5 which is 1,5 year old.
Same thing for EPEL.
Puppet version jumped to 2.6 after 0.25.5 and is now 2.7.
Whatever the latter change meant for the distrib in terms of dependencies, I haven't
found anything relevant in discussion groups/bugzilla.
puppet-2.6.6-1 is still in -testing:
F15: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-3581
EPEL6: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2011-2861
- Athmane
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
2:41 a.m.
Not to derail the thread too far, but upstream is now offering Puppet
in RPM format at yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora.
That might help if you'd like some newer items.
I'm also working with tmz on moving forward with the newer versions of
Puppet in Fedora/EPEL. Fedora shouldn't be a big problem. EPEL is a
bit more tricky as we have some behavior changes between 0.25, 2.6 and
2.7 .
(Disclaimer: I work at puppet labs)
stahnma
6:34 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Stahnke" <mastahnke(a)gmail.com>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 5:41:02 PM
Subject: Re: Puppet more recent version
Not to derail the thread too far, but upstream is now offering Puppet
in RPM format at yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora.
That might help if you'd like some newer items.
I'm also working with tmz on moving forward with the newer versions of
Puppet in Fedora/EPEL. Fedora shouldn't be a big problem. EPEL is a
bit more tricky as we have some behavior changes between 0.25, 2.6 and
2.7 .
(Disclaimer: I work at puppet labs)
stahnma
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Thanks Mike - That's effectively a big leap forward.
Although it's more likely a question to post on EPEL list:
Are the yum.puppetlabs.com/el packages not destined upfront for EPEL?.
What's the behaviour issue?
I understand packages would have to be rebuilt using RH standards but one would assume
they are compatible.
Do there is a roadmap for Puppet to make to RHEL 6?
Especially in regards of RHN Satellite roadmap and being able to pave the road in that
direction.
7:15 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gilles Dubreuil <gilles(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Stahnke" <mastahnke(a)gmail.com>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 5:41:02 PM
Subject: Re: Puppet more recent version
Not to derail the thread too far, but upstream is now offering Puppet
in RPM format at yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora.
That might help if you'd like some newer items.
I'm also working with tmz on moving forward with the newer versions of
Puppet in Fedora/EPEL. Fedora shouldn't be a big problem. EPEL is a
bit more tricky as we have some behavior changes between 0.25, 2.6 and
2.7 .
(Disclaimer: I work at puppet labs)
stahnma
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Thanks Mike - That's effectively a big leap forward.
Although it's more likely a question to post on EPEL list:
Are the yum.puppetlabs.com/el packages not destined upfront for EPEL?.
Puppet Labs
releases a version of Puppet about once a month. That's
kind of fast moving for EPEL (since you have to wait at least 2 weeks
in epel-testing). Sometimes Puppet breaks compatibility between
versions also. We try not to do this, but sometimes it happens. We're
really trying not to do that though.
What's the behaviour issue?
I understand packages would have to be rebuilt using RH standards but one would assume
they are compatible.
Packages are up to EPEL/RH standards. It's more an issue
of if you
had manifests/modules that worked with 0.25, then 2.6 in 2.7 they may
not quite work.
Do there is a roadmap for Puppet to make to RHEL 6?
Not sure about this question.
We support EL 6 today.
Especially in regards of RHN Satellite roadmap and being able to pave
the road in that direction.
I can't speak too much about Satellite, as I'm not much of a community
member there any more.
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
7:54 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Stahnke" <mastahnke(a)gmail.com>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:15:38 AM
Subject: Re: Puppet more recent version
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Gilles Dubreuil <gilles(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Stahnke" <mastahnke(a)gmail.com>
To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 5:41:02 PM
Subject: Re: Puppet more recent version
Not to derail the thread too far, but upstream is now offering Puppet
in RPM format at yum.puppetlabs.com/el or /fedora.
That might help if you'd like some newer items.
I'm also working with tmz on moving forward with the newer versions of
Puppet in Fedora/EPEL. Fedora shouldn't be a big problem. EPEL is a
bit more tricky as we have some behavior changes between 0.25, 2.6 and
2.7 .
(Disclaimer: I work at puppet labs)
stahnma
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Thanks Mike - That's effectively a big leap forward.
Although it's more likely a question to post on EPEL list:
Are the yum.puppetlabs.com/el packages not destined upfront for EPEL?.
Puppet Labs
releases a version of Puppet about once a month. That's
kind of fast moving for EPEL (since you have to wait at least 2 weeks
in epel-testing). Sometimes Puppet breaks compatibility between
versions also. We try not to do this, but sometimes it happens. We're
really trying not to do that though.
What's the behaviour issue?
I understand packages would have to be rebuilt using RH standards but one would assume
they are compatible.
Packages are up to EPEL/RH standards. It's more an issue
of if you
had manifests/modules that worked with 0.25, then 2.6 in 2.7 they may
not quite work.
Do there is a roadmap for Puppet to make to RHEL 6?
Not sure about this question.
We support EL 6 today.
Especially in regards of RHN Satellite roadmap and being able to pave
the road in that direction.
I can't speak too much about Satellite, as I'm not much of a community
member there any more.
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
What's the time-frame targeting Puppet 2.6/2.7 being part of EPEL 5/6?
I can't speak too much about Satellite, as I'm not much of a
community
member there any more.
Well, RHN Satellite road map is to make use of Puppet. But
Puppet stays an independent project, so one would expect it to be part of the RHEL
packages and not RHN Satellite. I believe that's a driver to make the hop from EPEL
towards RHEL standard packages.
4606
days inactive
4608
days old
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Athmane Madjoudj -
Gilles Dubreuil -
Michael Stahnke